Alley in Pisa, Italy

by Lars Kotthoff

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What is the structural and mechanical differences between a weather sealed body and a non weather sealed body? Is weather sealing still effective if the lens isn't weather sealed?

share|improve this question

3 Answers 3

up vote 15 down vote accepted

Weather Sealing is protection of the internal parts of a camera from external influences such as moisture, dust, and humidity. The degree of this weather sealing varies between manufacturers and also within models by each manufacturer.

The protection is provided by both rubber sealing with silicon rings and gaskets as well as design considerations such as interlocking panels and pool resistant exterior pieces. Most obviously buttons such as the shutter release will be designed with either a rubber housing beneath them, or a gasket to prevent the entry of the elements. Sealing is not provided by a single piece of hardware. I have often seen values such as 60-70 silicon rings being used in a typical DSLR body for weather sealing, and 30-40 being used in a battery grip for example.

Weather sealing in all but the most high end professional serious cameras is a relatively new occurrence in the consumer market. One can now commonly find weather sealing even in cameras costing under $1,000 USD if you look for the right models.

Commonly weather sealing considerations are limited to moisture from weather such as rain, snow, humidity, and also dust and sand. I would argue that weather sealing does not end at that, but also includes anything that protects the camera from usage and keeps it working as designed. With this in mind I would also consider features such as magnesium-alloy chassis design, shock protection, shielding against electromagnetic interference, stronger shutter mechanisms, sensor dust resistance, carbon-fiber lip on lens ends, and even special fluorine coatings on the low-pass filters as all being components of weather sealing.

Camera Bodies

Weather sealing is added during manufacturing, either as additional components in the design, or as part of the design of the camera. The best way to understand exactly what you get with weather sealing is to look at a diagram example from a camera, showing a cross section of the body with the added weather sealing components:

Canon 7D Sealing


¹ Image via Canon USA

The seals and gaskets highlighted in this image of a Canon 7D is what is considered the weather sealing.

Weather sealing can be described as John Carlson from Pentax described at thephoblographer.com:

“The seals that involve moving parts are constructed from a more elastic material than that used for fixed parts.” says Carlson. “By using a different material we can ensure it operates smoothly while maintaining its seal from dust and moisture.”

Lenses

You hinted at another good point which is how lenses play into the weather sealing equation. A camera body can be weather sealed, but if you add in a lens that is not, that in essence will compromise the integrity of the body weather sealing. Water could enter through the mount in these cases, and the gaskets and rings in the body design will not prevent this. With this in mind, to complete the weather sealing package you will want to look for a lens that is weather sealed as well. Some lenses(not all) require the addition of a front filter element to complete the weather sealing. Keep this in mind when purchasing weather sealed lenses and read the specifications to ensure you are equipping yourself properly.

Lens Sealing Image of Pentax 25mm f4 via thephoblographer.com

A good definition from Canon can be found at thephoblographer.com:

Chuck Westfall, Advisor for Technical Information at Canon USA states that, “Canon EF lenses that have been enhanced with countermeasures for dust and water resistance are typically equipped with rubber gaskets and seals at key points.

Similarly a definition from Pentax at thephoblographer.com:

John Carlson, Sr. Marketing Manager: “Our weather sealed lenses contain a silicon rubber material which is inserted in between each externally exposed part to ensure it is properly sealed against moisture and dust.”

I found a particularly interesting note about weather sealing of lenses from Roger Cicala, Owner of LensRentals.com:

"I’ve never been very impressed by anyone’s weather sealing. A rubber gasket at the lens mount, waterproof tape over the holes under the rubber, that’s about it. I can see that it would tend to keep water droplets from working their way inside the lens but I can’t imagine them surviving a steady rain – watersealed or not. I haven’t noted any difference in Canon, Nikon, or Olympus high end lenses."

Flash Units

Weather sealing doesn't end at camera bodies and lenses. Even external flash units can be weather sealed. The Canon Speedlite 600EX-RT for example has quite extensive weather sealing. It has a level of weather sealing that matches the moisture- and dust-resistance of the EOS-1D X camera body.

Canon Speedlite 600EX-RT Weather Sealing

¹ Image via Canon

An interesting development as of recently is that some pop up flash units on DSLR's are also now considered weather sealed. Historically this has been a failure point of weather sealing, but some how Pentax has been now offering DSLR's that are weather sealed and also have pop up flashes.

Caution

Weather sealing does not mean weather proof. It is uncommon for manufacturers to guarantee any performance based on the sealing. If a camera notes that it is weather sealed, you can be more confident using that equipment in inclement weather such as light rain or snow. Some models exhibit fantastic sealing and can be submerged in water for a time and still perform without issues. Other weather sealed models can fail even after a light spray of mist. I would advise caution unless you are certain that the sealing is sufficient in your conditions, and even then a bit of common sense can go a long way.

It was mentioned above, but I will mention it again here - if you use a non weather sealed lenses with a weather sealed body, you are risking a failure. The inverse is also true, using a sealed lens on a non sealed body can be troublesome. It is recommended to use a fully sealed kit including body and lenses when the conditions deem weather sealing necessary.

Connecting external adapters and or cables can also compromise the sealing. The connection of a USB, HDMI, PC, or other connector can force the opening of a protective cover that would then expose the camera body to external forces. Another issue can be battery grips, that typically require the opening of the battery door to insert the grip. Not all battery grips are weather sealed, and even those that are can negatively impact the weather sealing performance of the camera body.

Additional Information

share|improve this answer
2  
That was the best answer I have ever received to a question. Very comprehensive. I just have one more add-on question that is a bit subjective. Would you say weather sealing is worth it for wilderness photography such as long distance hiking baring in mind the extra weight? –  Good Gravy Aug 1 '13 at 16:04
1  
@GoodGravy - Your comment is exactly why I thought a comprehensive answer was good here. Weather sealing is not often tested in controlled environments outside of what the manufacturers themselves test. This fact breeds a certain amount of uncertainty in the community about how weather sealed a certain camera is, and what is acceptable usage or not. You are right is is very subjective because as far as I know no one objectively measures these items. Weather sealing is all about your needs. If it rains can you put your camera away? Would your trip be wrecked if your camera was unusable? –  dpollitt Aug 1 '13 at 16:20
    
I'm trecking through a jungle photographing insects, landscapes, and obviously the other people I'm going with. For me, it's a question of humidity rather than rain as I'm not sureif I would see anything other than damp plants whilst it's raining! –  Good Gravy Aug 1 '13 at 16:39
1  
@AJHenderson - Sorry for not a more direct link, but you have to follow that then expand the section "Operation and Construction". In that section you will see a video with water splashing on a DSLR, it is a great short video to watch! –  dpollitt Aug 1 '13 at 19:26
1  
@MichaelClark - interestingly, Canon lists the 24-70 f/2.8 II as being "constructed with improved dust sealing and water resistance" although it is not an internal zoom lens although they avoid saying moisture resistant like they do on the 70-200. –  AJ Henderson Aug 1 '13 at 20:00

Weather sealing generally consists of light o-ring seals around any openings and water/dust resistant sealing on the controls. Weather sealing is only as effective as the weakest link. If the lens isn't weather sealed, then no amount of weather sealing on the body will keep it weather sealed. It will make some difference from direct exposure to rain, but humidity will still enter through the lens mount and through the lens itself.

It can also be compromised by battery grips. The amount of compromise caused by a battery grip isn't as bad as that caused by a lens, but it still greatly reduces the weather sealed performance.

It is also worth noting that a weather sealed lens will not maintain it's weather sealing if used on a non-weather sealed body as moisture can enter the lens through the opening to the camera. It's also worth noting that some weather sealed lenses are only properly weather sealed when using a screw in filter.

share|improve this answer
    
@mattdm - have you had a non-weather sealed body fail in similar situations? The issue is that there is nothing that will prevent general moisture from entering the main camera body. It might not get direct water, but the moisture itself is the bigger problem. I will alter my answer to indicate it is severely compromised rather than useless though, because it does make some difference. I actually only meant to imply that it isn't considered weather-sealed when it isn't a full system, but my wording was poor. –  AJ Henderson Aug 1 '13 at 16:32
    
It is also worth noting that a number of lens that some lens (e.g. the 16-35 f/2.8) require a front filter to complete the weather seal -- check your owner's manual. –  Patrick Hurley Aug 1 '13 at 17:47
    
@PatrickHurley - thanks for re-iterating that, but I did mention it in my answer. Front filter could refer to a screw in or a gel holder. Only screw in would complete the weather proofing in those cases. –  AJ Henderson Aug 1 '13 at 17:51
    
Sorry my reading skills seem to be deteriorating :-) –  Patrick Hurley Aug 1 '13 at 18:01
    
@mattdm - By general moisture, I mean the humidity of the air. Any large opening is going to let moist air in quickly. If you leave your windows open, and it's 90% humidity outside, it's going to be humid in your house even though the roof keeps it from raining on you. –  AJ Henderson Aug 1 '13 at 18:10

1) A camera is weather sealed if it has - you guessed it, weather seals. Most importantly on buttons and openings but also along the case. The level of weathersealing varies - and it is also weathersealed not waterproof which some people think it is.

2) A non-sealed lens can allow water to enter the camera via the lens but more importantly via the lens mount. I.e. a non-sealed lens breaks a camera's weather sealing.

As to it being effective, well, you need to be the judge of that. People have used unsealed cameras in rain before without issues - others experienced a sealed camera failing in bad weather... Weather sealing means your camera is more likely to withstand humidity - it is not a guarantee that it will.

(If you want waterproof, the enclosures one can buy for diving are a good start, BUT they can be as expensive as the camera body itself.)

share|improve this answer
1  
Or waterproof enclosures can be more expensive than the camera itself, particularly for DSLRs, it's just about a guarantee. Between the body and ports for a DSLR enclosure, it normally costs $3000 - $5000, though non-modular systems that only operate some camera controls and only support a single lens can be had for the $1000 to $1600 range. –  AJ Henderson Aug 1 '13 at 14:24

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.