by ʇolɐǝz ǝɥʇ qoq

Submit your Photo
Hall of Fame

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I already have a 50/1.4 lens and plan to buying a more expensive version of this lens which only just came out and still not available in most parts of the world. Since this is a brand new lens, there is a large online community that is eager to know how these two lens compare. What is a proper way to do lens comparison? What tools would I need? And is it possible to do it at home?

Should I be printing out test charts? If so where? And what about lighting conditions, would it matter? What are some comparison shots I should prepare? Center vs corner and others?

share|improve this question
Is this a Canon or Nikon lens? Any links you can incorporate for more information of the lens? – Regmi Jun 26 '13 at 18:00
@Regmi Why would that matter? (And why assume that is not, for example, Sigma?) – mattdm Jun 26 '13 at 20:37
No, it would not matter. Was curious to know which one it was. – Regmi Jun 26 '13 at 20:54

You can look at DxO Labs description of their testing protocol. Be sure to click on next at the bottom of each page to read the entire document.

As the above link indicates, for testing to be meaningful it must take place in strictly controlled and reproducible conditions. This includes seemingly insignificant things such as temperature and humidity, as well as more obvious factors such as lighting that can be uniformly measured. There are standard test charts, such as ISO12233 targets, but the results are only meaningful if they are used under uniform lighting that conforms with the test standards as set out by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

share|improve this answer

My suggestion is to avoid test charts. For these to be really meaningful, conditions have to be carefully controlled, and when comparing models of lenses generally, it helps to have multiple copies of each lens.

When the technical reviews from professional or dedicated amateur technical reviewers come out, people can start obsessing over the numbers. I think a better thing to do is look for situations which demonstrate the general, practical performance of each lens and take comparison shots.

See What characteristics make a good lens good? for ideas of things to look for and situations to look for them in.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.