Before the rush

Before the rush
by evan-pak

Submit your Photo
Hall of Fame

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have one lens hood for a 28-105mm lens that is petal shaped. I have another lens hood for a 50mm lens that is fully round. If the purpose of the lens hood is to block stray light, then wouldn't fully round always block more?

share|improve this question
up vote 11 down vote accepted

As Chills stated, petal shaped hoods are designed to better take into account the wider shape of a camera's film or sensor.

This article on Lens Flare has a good description of lens hoods and how they function.

enter image description here

share|improve this answer
This doesn't really answer the question, just link to a article / page that might. Would be better if the answer contained the information, like @Reid's answer. – Håkon K. Olafsen Jul 13 '12 at 11:37

The petal design is more effective. Think of what you can see through your lens: it is a pyramid-shaped chunk of space that falls within your view, one that has a rectangular rather than a square base. Now imagine placing a round lens hood atop that pyramid - there will be a large gap on each side, because the corners bump into the round opening first. A petal-shaped hood fills in these gaps, excluding more stray light.

share|improve this answer

Here's an image that may help people to visualise why lens hoods are petal-shaped.


share|improve this answer

For wider angle lenses the optimal design is the petal shape. This is because of the rectangular sensor and wide field of view.

share|improve this answer
The optimal design for all lenses is petal shaped, but I suppose for longer lenses it would be quite a petal. – Reid Jul 16 '10 at 2:20
@Reid Preidhorsky As you say, because of the narrower FoV for telephoto lenses, the hood would have to be seriously long before it became necessary to petal-shape it in order to avoid vignetting. – Edd Jul 22 '10 at 15:55
For some fisheyes expected to produce a circular image, I would assume that a round shape is optimal. But in most cases we are using a circular lens to take rectangular pictures on a rectangular sensor or film. – Markus Mikkolainen Apr 27 '13 at 12:46

Petal shaped hoods are better (because they fit better the rectangular size of the negative/sensor), but they can only be used in cameras which have a non-rotating front element.

share|improve this answer

Short answer: Yes, a round tubular lens hood will always block more stray light than a petal-shaped lens hood.

BUT, that's only half of the answer, however. The part that is missing is, "without cutting off (vignetting) the corners of the image at the widest angle used, in the case of a zoom." (an important omission, no?)

The petal shape is one compromise solution unless designed specifically for a particular fixed-focal lens.

Another solution is used by some manufacturers who make an over-size tube lens filter and then cut a rectangular window in the end for the light blocking.

Motion picture cameras have such a thing attached to the camera mount in some way. It is also called a matte box and allows various inserts to mask the shot from various things and for various effects. It is a pleated accordion-fold affair that allows it to be changed for various set-ups.

share|improve this answer

Every lens projects a circular image, but film and digital sensors are rectangular. In the case of DSLRs, the rectangle is usually quite oblong, with the standard 3:2 aspect ratio — that is, half again as much width as height.

The more a lens hood shades except the part that forms the image, the better. Petal hoods can take advantage of this by providing more shading for the parts of the frame that are farthest from the edge of the circle (primarily the top and bottom, followed by the edges) and less shading where the frame gets close (the corners).

Focal length is also a big factor, again for logical reasons — the wider the lens, the wider the hood has to be to stay out of the way. This means that for longer focal lengths ("telephoto lenses"), a tubular non-petal design can provide quite a lot of shade, and going to a petal design is basically unnecessary and could be even unwieldy, protruding way, way out.

As a practical example, the following image was taken with a 23mm lens, which has a nice petal hood, but which I had quickly attached so that it was diagonally-askew rather than on straight. You can see exactly what it'd be like if the hood extended to the length of the petal all the way around:

accidental mispetalling

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.