Time to be with your loved ones

Time to be with loved ones

by sat

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

It may sound weird – we are trying to compare a point-and-shoot with a dSLR. Why? I already have a low priced auto-focus camera with 4x zoom. Now, my aim is to take decent shallow DoF photos. The maximum budget I can spend along with lens is $600. EOS 1100-D with the lens kit given fits into this budget.

  1. EOS 1100-D with 18-55 & 55-250 IS MK II
  2. Canon PowerShot SX160 28 - 448 mm IS F/3.5-5.9

In the following review, one obvious difference is the sensor size. Canon EOS Rebel T3 / 1100D has approx. 1054% more surface area than Canon PowerShot SX160 IS. http://www.digicamdb.com/compare/canon_powershot-sx160-is-vs-canon_eos-rebel-t3/

Comparing with PowerShot SX160, does EOS 1100-D produce enormously better shallow DoF?

I can get PowerShot SX160 at one third price of EOS 1100-D. So, is the investment worth in creating good shallow DoF photos?

share|improve this question
2  
Is shallow DoF your primary concern? In that case, take a look at this question. There may be other factors you want I consider beyond that and price, though — see this one on that. –  mattdm Jun 5 '13 at 12:58
1  
If all you want is extreme shallow depth of field, any DSLR with a 50mm f/1.8 lens is going to blow away that point and shoot. Even better would be the 85mm f/1.8 which is still reasonably priced. –  dpollitt Jun 5 '13 at 13:35
add comment

marked as duplicate by mattdm, AJ Henderson, MikeW, Paul Cezanne, John Cavan Jun 7 '13 at 10:42

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted

I'm going to ignore everything and only compare DOF - but it feels a little silly, a P&S and a DSLR are pretty different in more important ways.

Short answer:

Theoretically the 1100D with the kit lens will give you about 1/3 of the DOF of the SX160, I suspect based on my experience with P&S cameras that in practice the difference is greater - and the 1100D will be much easier to control in the (semi) manual mode you need to minimize DOF.

Also, with a cheap lens upgrade like the 50mm f/1.8 ($100) or the 40mm f/2.8 ($150) you will reach shallow DOF you can't even dream of with a point and shoot (at 10 feet distance, with the 50mm at f/1.8 you'll have just 0.8 feet of DOF).

Boring number crunching:

according to the dofmaster.com depth of field calculator:

With the subject at 10 feet:

EOS 1100D at 55mm f/5.6 (most zoomed in and wide open with the kit lens) will give you a total DOF of 2.1 feet

SX160 at the same field of view (15mm real, not equiv) at f/5 (because I don't know what the max aperture at 15mm is) will give you 7.6 feet

With the subject at 20 feet:

EOS 1100D at 250mm f/5.6 (the 55-250 zoomed in and wide open) - 0.39 feet

The SX160 at max zoom (448 equiv) wide open (f/5.9) - 1.06 feet

share|improve this answer
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.