by ʇolɐǝz ǝɥʇ qoq

Submit your Photo
Hall of Fame

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Hi I recently came across the works of an old photographer named [Jean Gilletta]( He worked in Nice, France around the turn of the 20th century. A lot of his works are still in pristine condition because the process he used was glass plates (on gelatin I believe) which apparently lasts a very long time (irrelevant to me).

Anyway I thought about doing some medium/large format black and white photography but the film is supposed to be very difficult to get nowadays. I wondered if glass plate was a viable alternative, if I could get my hands on the camera, would it be easy to do the development at home?

What chemicals would be required? What is involved? is it practical?

share|improve this question
up vote 8 down vote accepted

The long-lasting nature of those photographs isn't so much due to the glass plates as such, but the choice of glass plates over the film of the day. The nitrate (nitrocellulose) films of the era degraded quickly, became brittle, and had the quite annoying tendency of bursting into flames. (They're made from a close relative of gun cotton.) The gelatin emulsion is still delicate and prone to damage from things that eat it (fungi and insects, mostly. Glass plates are (obviously) fragile, and are probably more of a problem than current sheet film (which is acetate- or polyester-based; acetate films can degrade if not stored properly, but polyester is nearly indestructible).

But certainly you can make and use plates. (You can even buy them, but they're mostly for astronomical use.) You can purchase traditional emulsions, like Rockland's Liquid Light commercially, which will develop with standard black-and-white paper processes (most are orthochromatic and designed for printing rather than for negative/plate; panchromatic emulsions for negatives are much harder to find, and usually come from garage-sized operations, but they'll develop with standard film developers and processes). And please note that "Diazo" emulsions are not what you want; they're UV-hardening emulsions for the screen printing (serigraphy) process. But the current vogue process for DIY plates is wet collodion.

Either way, you're going to wind up with a negative/plate that shows inconsistencies and flaws, simply because you won't have the carefully-controlled conditions and equipment needed to apply the emulsion in a uniform and completely predictable manner. If you accept those inconsistencies and learn to create them in a semi-controlled manner, you can achieve some very pleasing effects. (That's particularly true if you use a Petzval-design lens wide open.)

That said, sheet film isn't all that hard to get. It is expensive, but then it always was. And it was never (at least not in my lifetime) something you could find at the corner store; you needed to depend on large photo stores. B&H carries a good selection, as does Calumet Photo (one of the last remaining hard-core large format/view camera shops in North America). I'm sure you could find others just about anywhere in the world if you looked.

share|improve this answer
Thanks a lot! Great answer.. I can't vote up cos I'm a n00b – Not a chance Jun 4 '13 at 3:55

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.