by ʇolɐǝz ǝɥʇ qoq

Submit your Photo
Hall of Fame

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've recently started my photography course at uni and have now been exposed to the program "Aperture". After finding this program extremely helpful and easy to use I get told its Mac-based only and being a Windows person I was quite disheartened by this. So can anyone point me in the right direction of finding a cheap Macbook?


share|improve this question
A cheap MacBook does not really run Aperture that well unless you buy a memory upgrade. 2GB of memory (standard in current low-end models) does not seem to be enough in practice. An upgrade from 2GB to 8GB made a huge difference for me (unbearable vs. useful). – Jukka Suomela Oct 5 '10 at 15:29
See also: – Rowland Shaw Nov 4 '10 at 13:26
up vote 6 down vote accepted

As above, I'd suggest looking into Adobe Lightroom, which is a sort-of equivalent Photo process-management-library-workflow program. As a student, you'd qualify for a discount from Adobe on it, and it's also worth remembering that you can use the Apple store for education (or Higher Education for an even bigger saving) which will reduce the cost further if you intend to go down the Mac route.

There is a free demo of Lr available from here, so I'd give that a try on your Windows PC first and foremost.

share|improve this answer
Lightroom kicks ass. – Nick Bedford Dec 8 '10 at 23:16

I have two suggestions:

share|improve this answer
+1 for lightroom-- previous versions of aperture were quite hardware-hungry (no idea about the current iteration), while lightroom 3 seems to run pretty well on my 4 year old laptop. – mmr Oct 5 '10 at 15:27

I strongly suggest looking at Lightroom too. I've tried Aperture and for some reason the interface seems more distracting than the Lightroom interface. Lightroom places the emphasis on the photos being displayed smack bang in the center of your workflow and all the palettes surround it but in a more subtle way due to the consistent dark UI.

I run Lightroom in fullscreen and it's great as all of the control remains but you are 'sectioned' off from the rest of your distracting computer environment such as browsers and social networking apps etc.

share|improve this answer
Funny, I find the LR UI to be more distracting, mostly because there tends to be a lot of UI there that you can't get rid of, whereas on Aperture, it's easier (at least as far as I've been able to tell) to get more things to be more hidden more of the time. Instead of being black, they're just gone. – lindes Dec 9 '10 at 2:34

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.