Moonrise & Aurora

Moonrise & Aurora

by Jakub

submit your photo


Picture of the Week Themes
Suggest and vote on themes

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Tell me more ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Turns out that telephoto refers to a specific construction of a long-focal-length lens, i.e., one where the lens is physically shorter than the focal length.

Is there a generic term for referring to lenses of long focal length, while being agnostic as to their optical construction, other than just "long lens"? (Wikipedia claims there's not.)

Alternately, is this distinction simply pedantry and I should just call all long lenses telephoto?

share|improve this question

4 Answers

up vote 12 down vote accepted

Firstly words, even technical terms, change meaning over time with usage. "Prime" originally meant the primary lens of a multi-lens cine camera. Now it means a lens with fixed focal length (sometime incorrectly called a fixed-focus lens). While we're on the subject, telephoto isn't even nearly the most incorrectly used term (that would almost certainly be HDR), people often confuse "depth of focus" with "depth of field", use "depth of field" to refer to "bokeh", use "bokeh" to refer to the degree of defocus in an image, the list goes on.

To answer your question, the only non-construction specific term to apply to a lens with a long focal length is simply "long". The distinction is not pedantry as it makes a big difference for large format photography, when using camera movements. Since the nodal point of a telephoto lens is in front of the optic rather than roughly in the middle, any lens tilts will require you to shift the lens again in order to restore the composition. Thus telephotos are more difficult to use and usually reserved for when size and weight are critical.

share|improve this answer

I am not certain about Wikipedia's accuracy here, as the statements about the focal length of a lens being longer than the lens itself is unreferenced, and there is no way to verify such statements.

Given the greek root 'tele-' means "at a distance" or "far away", the term "telephoto" would logically refer to a lens that makes it possible to photograph objects "at a distance" or "far away", and have little to do with the relationship between physical length and focal length.

Here are the standard focal length classifications as I understand them (for 35mm, multiply by crop factor for different formats):

  • Ultra-Wide Angle: <24mm
  • Wide Angle: 24mm - 35mm
  • Normal (Standard): 35mm - 60mm
  • Telephoto: 60mm - 200mm
  • Super Telephoto: >200mm
share|improve this answer
When I hit a few sales sites, the telephoto range seems to start at about 85mm, but I wonder if that's because of the rise of the APS-C sensor more than anything else since 85mm is very close to the far end of the common portrait length of 80mm for standard full frame. Anyways, I think Wiki is pretty accurate in this regards, at least with zooms and the slower telephoto primes which would imply that the fast telephoto lenses are "long focus length" if their dimensions match to their focal length as they're often absolute monster lenses... – John Cavan Sep 29 '10 at 3:48
1  
Physically speaking, 85mm would be the next step up from a 60mm lens. I've seen 60mm lenses, and I've seen 85mm lenses, but I can't say I've seen a 70mm lens. I just listed complete ranges without any holes. Wiki is accurate only when fully referenced, and a lot of the photographic articles are very lacking in the way of references to back up their claims. There may be a "gap" between 60mm and 85mm that we could call "long focal length", but I think its a relatively moot point since there aren't many (if any...I think Sigma may make one) lenses that actually fill that gap. – jrista Sep 29 '10 at 5:47
I guess I left out zoom lenses. There are numerous zoom lenses that either start or end at 70mm, which would fill that gap. I've never heard of the range between 60mm and 85mm called anything special, and Wikipedia is the only (unreferenced) place that called them "long focal length" lenses that I know of. – jrista Sep 29 '10 at 6:03
Wikipedia is indeed accurate here, if you look at any large format photography site there will be discussion of telephoto vs. non-telephoto designs. – Matt Grum Sep 29 '10 at 7:49
1  
Although this entire answer doesn't really pertain to the question, here's a 70mm lens: photozone.de/pentax/… You might as well throw a short telephoto range in that list. – Eruditass Oct 2 '10 at 0:04
show 3 more comments

The only construction-agnostic term would be long lens to compliment the other lens classes: wideangle and normal.

The complimentary set to telephotos would be long-focus lenses:

Optical designs of telephoto lenses must contain a telephoto group, which allows the lens to be physically shorter than its focal length. A lens with a conventional design and a focal length longer than a normal lens should properly be referred to as long focus.

And from wikipedia:

A telephoto lens works by having the outermost (i.e. light gathering) element of a much shorter focal length than the equivalent long-focus lens ...

Long-focus lenses aren't used much anymore, at least in the SLR world, so you can basically just use telephoto to refer to longer focal lengths and not have to worry.

share|improve this answer
Yes, most of the mentions I found were in the context of large-format photography, for example: everything2.com/user/m_turner/writeups/telephoto+lens – Sean Sep 29 '10 at 4:19

Well, to use Wikipedia as well, it would appear that the options are telephoto and long focus lenses and that makes some sense based on the explanation that telephoto lenses are designed to overcome some of the shortcomings of the latter. Having said that, I think telephoto has basically come to mean anything about 100mm or longer and nobody will be confused if you used the term generically for any long lens. Though, these days, I begin to wonder if anyone sees 100mm as telephoto now...

share|improve this answer
It would cause confusion outside of the 35mm SLR world - the original question didn't specify format, and this site is about photography not just compacts/DSLRs. – Matt Grum Sep 29 '10 at 7:56
Perhaps it would, but the percentage of camera users using a camera larger than the 35mm format is statistically small enough that it approaches zero. So, while you're technically correct, the vast common usage would suggest that there is no practical confusion. – John Cavan Sep 29 '10 at 10:37

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.