Road Train !!!!!!!!!!

by Russell McMahon

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've seen lots of photos printed on foamboard getting warped - looks like the side where the printing is done contracts (and the opposite side does not) and so the print becomes slightly U-shaped instead of flat.

Is this a common problem? How is it resolved?

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

Photos aren't often printed on foam board, but they are mounted on them.

One of the major commandments when producing works of art on a rigid substrate like wood, masonite or heavy board is "whatsoever thou doest to one side, that shalt thou also do unto the other side". Essentially, that means making sure that however one modifies the stresses upon or the absorbency of one side of the ground, you have to match on the other side. In the case of mounting photos to foam boards, you are covering the paper on one side of the board with glue and another piece of paper having at least a sizing and probably a glossier ink-receptive coating to one side of the board. That will significantly affect the rate at which moisture migrates into the paper component on that side of the board, while the other side is free to absorb humidity and expand. So it isn't the printed side contracting that's the problem, it's the back expanding.

You can mount another piece of the same type of paper on the back of the board, making sure that any varnishes, etc., used on the front are also used on the back. (Commonly, one would use a lighter/cheaper weight of paper on the back -- it's the glue and coatings that matter more than the paper itself.) Or you could step up to a more rigid support (Gatorfoam, painter's panel with bracing, gessoed hardboard).

Mounting on foam board is, though, at best a short-term display solution. It isn't archival, and isn't meant to be. It isn't a substitute for proper framing.

share|improve this answer
    
Like the commandment! What is an archival quality framing / proper framing? I know archival inks/paper combo can last 150+ years (so they say) but how should such photo be framed? No matter what i do, if it is not glued to a foam board or similar the photo always buckles and wrinkles. –  Jakub Feb 18 '13 at 17:15
3  
@Jakub: You don't usually preserve a print by adhering all of it to another substance. Using T hinges to mount to a matte is a better option because it lets all of the materials expand and contract at their own rates, preventing stress on the print. –  Blrfl Feb 18 '13 at 17:20

As Stan points out ""whatsoever thou doest to one side, that shalt thou also do unto the other side". There is actually no other method, unless your shots are kept in an environment with perfectly controlled humidity, and temperature. Many types of glue contains small amount of water, which makes the photo expand as you apply it to the foam core, thus greatly affecting the amount of warping.

Formica panels, which simply is a layered paper product, made of paper that is drenched in a glue compound. It is often used as a hard-wearing surface, on benches, floors, and so on, glued to a substrate, which often is plywood, fibre board, or a similar material. I've seen table tops made up of 3/4" finest plywood bending amazingly, just because the manufacturer didn't apply any similar paper on the bottom, so 'Stan's Rule' certainly should be obeyed, always!

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.