Lunch atop a (Springfield) skyscraper

Lunch atop a (Springfield) skyscraper
by andy-m                

Submit your Photo
Hall of Fame

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Cameras rarely specify exactly what speed cards you should be using in them - I just checked the manual for my DSLR, and all it says is to use an SDHD card, and a "high speed" card should be used for recording video.

On the other hand, there are a number of different rating systems for memory card speed (33x! 150x! Class 2! Class 10!) and price seems to increase with speed.

Is there any way to test the maximum write speed the camera is capable of? Are the read/write speeds documented anywhere?

share|improve this question
up vote 12 down vote accepted

Camera reviews on dpreview mention writing speeds (example: EOS 550D).

If there's no documentation it should be possible to derive actual camera+card write speed by switching to RAW and shooting in sequence until your buffer fills up (then shooting fps should go down significantly). Then writing_speed = raw_file_size * fps_with_full_buffer.

share|improve this answer
Note that this method of measuring requires already having access to a card that is fastest you'd consider buying. – Imre Nov 25 '12 at 8:51

For SDHC cards there are "Class" ratings that indicate the speed. There is a table on wikipedia that compares the ratings, but the class # is the key.

I have used Class 10, which is fairly affordable, but still quite fast. It will never hurt to have a faster card, so given a choice you always want the higher class.


There is a new designation of "Ultra High Speed" (UHS) which have a theoretical limit of 104MB/s and a version two coming (UHS-II) which has a theoretical limit of 312MB/s

share|improve this answer
A bought a class 6 card as well, but I'm wondering if I could get away with a 2 or 4, or if I'm missing out on not getting a class 10. – chris Jul 16 '10 at 0:46
@chris, are you finding that you are taking lots of consecutive shots and waiting for the card to finish writing before you can take more? That seems to be the biggest driving force for wanting to upgrade. – Oddthinking Jul 16 '10 at 2:08
Not often, but it does happen. I haven't had any problems recording videos yet, so I assume a class 6 is "good enough", but I'd really like to be able to prove it. – chris Jul 16 '10 at 13:41
"Class" speeds are all based on the maximum read speed a card can maintain. For camera usage, the primary consideration is write speed which can vary wildly from one card to the next within a particular class. – Michael Clark Jan 22 at 19:19

Deciding what card to buy for a specific camera in order to get the fastest performance of which the camera is capable without spending more than necessary on a card that is even faster than the camera is capable of taking advantage is a daunting task. Not only can it be very confusing when comparing speeds of various cards, but learning how fast a write speed your camera is capable of can be near impossible. Manufacturers rarely publish the maximum speeds at which their cameras can write to a sufficiently fast memory card. And many times faster, larger, newer cards can be cheaper than the older cards their predecessors replaced!

The current methods of rating various card speeds is, to put it mildly, A MESS. While the majority of cameras currently produced use some form of SD card (SD, SDHC, SDXC, and SDIO), many of the top professional models use CF cards. Even cameras that have slots for both types of cards often perform better in terms of speed when using a top rated CF card.

Part of the confusion among CF and older SD cards is the difference between read speeds, which is what most 133x, 600x, or 1000x ratings are based on and write speeds, which are what most photographers are concerned with since it affects the camera's performance when shooting large numbers of frames in quick succession. The newer Video Performance Guide (VPG) rating is based upon the cards minimum continuous write speed, expressed in MB/sec. Unfortunately the only two tiers we see seem to see in the current marketplace are VPG-20 and VPG-65. A few VPG-45 rated cards (the speed needed to perform smoothly with 1080P HD video) surfaced at one time, but most of those same cards now carry the VPG-65 rating needed to insure smooth performance with 4K video. And with many newer cameras now capable of writing over 100 MB/s with the fastest cards, knowing two cards are capable of 65MB/s doesn't go a long way toward determining which is best for a particular camera if you're more worried about how fast your camera's buffer clears shooting stills in burst mode than you are meeting the minimum requirements for HD or 4K video.

With SD cards, the capacity of the card is the primary determination as to whether it is an SD, SDHC, or SDXC card. Base transfer speeds are required to be higher for SDHC cards than SD cards using base speeds, and also for SDXC cards compared to SDHC cards at base speeds. But there is nothing preventing a manufacturer from producing a lower capacity SDHC (or even SD) card that is capable of faster speeds than the required base transfer speed of an SDXC card. With SDHC and SDXC cards transfer speeds are rated by the UHS-I or UHS-II specification, but write speeds may still be slower. Standards for SD cards designated as belonging to a certain Speed Class Ratings were developed to address the need for cards to be rated at particular write speeds as well as read speeds. But there can still be much variation between different cards of the same speed class rating as well as different speeds obtained from the same card depending on such things as the frequency of soft errors, file fragmentation, and whether a single large file or multiple smaller files are being written to the card. Also note that an UHS-I rating is not the same as an UHS Class 1 (U1) rating!

Several years ago one go-to guide for Canon or Nikon shooters would have been Rob Galbraith's Digital Photography Insights. But the information there has become dated. The most recent Canon cameras tested were the Canon 5D mkIII and 1D mkIV (No 1D X, which released just after the 5D3). There were many more cameras that had test results listed at one time, but many of those cameras don't even appear on the drop down list any more and some of the cameras still in the drop down list no longer display any test data. (The page linked above does contain some good information regarding how memory cards work and how to identify a particular card). To the best of my knowledge there is no comprehensive database that tests a plethora of cards in each of many camera models currently on the market. I would love to be shown such a database that proves I am misinformed at this point! Camera Memory Speed does have a limited list of newer models and more recent cards.

So what can a camera owner do to find what the most efficient memory card is for a particular camera? One that is capable of the camera's top speed without being overkill? Short of buying a bunch of cards and testing them yourself, there are places to look to find some help.

I always start by reading the camera's manual. Even if the camera's write speed isn't explicitly spelled out, there are often clues. For instance, on page 61 and again on page 270 of the Canon 7D Instruction Manual (updated edition for firmware v.2 or later) we read the following:

"Figures in parentheses apply to an UDMA, 128GB card based on Canon's testing standards."

So we should probably consider an Ultra DMA (UDMA) compliant CF card.

My experience is that an internet search (google, bing, etc.) can also usually turn up something. Search google for "Canon 7D UDMA card speeds", and one of the top results is this link. A member has posted results of a test he conducted with his 7D and various CF cards rated at different speeds. Substitute 'Nikon D700' for 'Canon 7D' and you get similar results for that camera. As with most google searches, the more you know before you start, the easier it is to find what you need. Include 'UDMA-7" in the 7D search and the top result leads you to this discussion which makes it fairly clear that an UDMA-7 card is no faster in the 7D, even after updating the firmware to version 2, than an UDMA-6 card. So for the 7D, an optimal card would be a UDMA-6 compliant card.

Say you have a Canon T5i. What can we learn about it? Page 89 of the manual indicates a UHS-I compatible 8GB card was used to generate the best burst performance. Note that the burst performance increases with the UHS-I card when shooting JPEGs but stays at 8 frames when shooting RAW. Canon Europe's support site says a large capacity Class 6 or higher SD should be used when shooting video. So in the case of the T5i, the question would be whether you plan to shoot JPEG, RAW, or video most of the time. How you answer that would determine whether the UHS-I Class 10 card would be overkill or not.

As to how various cards of the same rating compare, reviews such as this one at tom's HARDWARE are fairly easy to find and show that not all Class 10 cards will out perform all Class 6 cards. Once you've narrowed it down, you can always check the reviews for a particular card at These reviews for the SanDisk Extreme 32 GB SDHC Class 10 UHS-1 Flash Memory Card 80MB/s (SDSDXS-032G-X46) are fairly typical. There are usually several reviewers who will post results of their test with a certain card. Some reviewers will demonstrate more knowledge and objectivity than others. The review rating system at amazon is useful for pointing to the most helpful reviews.

Note that as the use of high speed, high capacity SD/SDHC/SDXC cards become more ubiquitous, the prices have trended downward. This is probably a result of both higher volumes and increased competition among suppliers. The fastest CF cards, though, can still get rather pricey. But for cameras with dual slots the fastest CF cards usually outperform the fastest SDXC cards (as of November 2015).

A SanDisk Extreme 32 GB SDHC Class 10 UHS-1 Flash Memory Card 80MB/s currently sells for under $30 US at A SanDisk 32GB Extreme Pro CF memory card - UDMA 90MB/s 600x currently sells at for $167 US. The SD card reads at 80MB/sec, the CF card reads at 90MB/sec and costs five times as much. A newer UDMA-7 Sandisk 32GB Extreme Pro CF Card rated at 160MB/sec is much cheaper at $53 US, but a newer version of the 32GB SDHC Class 10 UHS-1 Flash Memory Card 95MB/s rated at 95 MB/sec is only $25 US.

And as always, beware the deals on the top brands that seem too good to be true. The most expensive cards are also the ones most often counterfeited. The best way to protect yourself from buying a counterfeit card is to only buy from reputable sources that have a liberal return policy.

What with the different write speeds for cards rated the same based on their read speed and the fact that there have been issues with certain camera/card combinations based on the camera's formatting method vs. the card's firmware, the only real way to know for sure how a particular card will perform in a particular camera is to test each card in each camera and compare the performance. To do it scientifically would mean using multiple copies of each from different production runs.

As stated above, there is no such comprehensive database of which I am aware. In addition to the Rob Galbraith site listed above, Camera Memory Speed does virtually identical tests with a fairly limited number of the newest cameras and memory cards. The models listed at CMS pick up right about the same time the RG site stopped testing any newer cameras. One likely reason there is not such a database is that memory cards marketed and sold under the same name/model number are often not identical in their hardware or firmware from one batch to the next. And the various cards are introduced and then replaced so frequently that it would be a herculean task to keep up with the changes in the cards currently on the market, much less test them in all compatible cameras that are also constantly evolving with firmware updates and new model introductions!

The speed at which the camera's buffer (not processor) can write to a card is affected by the way the card communicates with the camera just as it is affected by the camera's hardware and firmware limitations. A "write" operation also includes the card's controller sending certain responses back to the camera verifying the integrity of the data that was received.

In the end the marketplace often renders the question moot. Current cards, with higher capacities and speeds, are often cheaper to buy from sources that move a lot of cards in short time periods (i.e. amazon, B&H, or newegg), than older cards that are slower and smaller and have been languishing in smaller sellers inventories for months and even years! The difference in prices are usually based more on brand marketing than anything else. And all of the major brands (Lexar, SanDisk, Transcend, Kingston, etc.) get their components from the same handful of suppliers that actually manufacture the memory chips and controller chips. So do the off-brand names, but they usually buy the leftover components that may or may not have been good enough to pass the QC of the major brands' buyers.

And if you buy a memory card via eBay, you never know if you're getting a genuine branded card or a counterfeit. There are probably more fake SanDisk cards in circulation worldwide than genuine ones! So always buy memory cards from reputable dealers that will let you return a card if it isn't up to spec.

share|improve this answer
My experience with 3 Canon EOS models, a GoPro Hero, some camcorder that I borrowed in 2008, all had Class specs required. Now we know that class 10 is for full hd video, but maximum buffer dumping write speeds I agree is rarely in the manual unless they are boasting it as a feature. – JDługosz Jan 12 '15 at 3:35

The other very detailed answers have a lot of useful information, but at the end of the day, the ratings, reported speeds, and classes for the media are not trustworthy. All the manufacturers play a little fast and loose with the admittedly loosely defined speed criteria and reporting.

Now, the camera manual will refer to specific aspects of media that they can make guarantees about. So, as long as you get media that falls into those categories, the media will work, usually at the camera's best speed. Where "best" is defined for sustained, multiple writes (i.e., not "optimal" lab speeds.)

This implies that, in practice, the criteria for choosing media pretty works out to:

  1. Does it meet or exceed the basic class or category set out in the manual? (1b: is it within the maximum size that some cameras comfortably can work with. This isn't a critical criteria, usually, but some cameras freak out when they can store more files on media than there are grains of sand on the planet.)
  2. Does it appear that the media is a reputable brand and probably isn't one of the dodgy rebranded grey-market items?
  3. Is the media a good price for the size we need?

That is, I've found that "over-buying" a super fast card that is otherwise the right quality (defined loosely, I know!) and size at a good price-point is better than trying to find the optimal advertised class or speed.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.