Paris

by Jon

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I was curious why they do sketches of people in the court room still. I would think taking pictures would be much easier. That and I'm curious why it started in the first place.

enter image description here

share|improve this question

closed as off topic by mattdm, Mark Whitaker, Matt Grum, Nick Miners, Itai Jan 8 '13 at 0:11

Questions on Photography Stack Exchange are expected to relate to photography within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1  
Because cameras and other recording devices aren't allowed in many courtrooms. But I think why is kinda off topic. –  mattdm Jan 7 '13 at 22:35

2 Answers 2

It's because a lot of courtrooms don't allow cameras/photography.

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53 states, "Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom." However, some federal courtrooms experimented with cameras from 1991 to 1994. The courts have thus far been unwilling to overturn the ban on cameras, citing "concerns with expenditure of judicial time on administration and oversight of broadcasting; the necessity of sequestering juries so that they will not look at the television program of the trial itself; the difficulty in empaneling an impartial jury in the case of a retrial; the necessity of larger jury panels or increased use of marshals; the psychological effects on witnesses, jurors, lawyers, and judges; and related considerations of 'solemnity,' 'dignity,' and the like."

[emphasis mine]

share|improve this answer

I assume that the tradition started before cameras, and it has carried on - mostly because an artist is a lot quieter than an SLR on rapid frame rate!

Also, you can be very 'selective' with an artist drawing and not include people who should be in the public domain - defence witness, jury and so on.

share|improve this answer
    
I know this q is old but I had to edit this... Even though the answer Is wrong :/ –  bazite Feb 22 '13 at 0:30

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.