At current, most of my landscape shots are tourist-like and very generic. How can I take photographs which are more interesting without using the cliché technique of long exposure landscape photography?
|
closed as not a real question by Matt Grum, Itai, jrista♦ Jan 7 at 17:59
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, see the FAQ.
|
You say your photos are too tourist-like. So, try avoiding taking pictures the way tourists usually do:
Instead, try using:
|
|||||
|
|
Landscape photographers only photograph for half an hour a day, 15 minutes in the dawn and 15 minutes in the dusk. If you want to get the same pictures as they do, you have to wait for the light. However, you can still improve your images beyond tourist snaps if you want to photograph landscapes at other times:
For some of those you can also try the opposite, i.e. a really wide aperture, or climbing up to get a different angle. |
|||||||
|
|
Imre mentioned Framing and Composition, and I'd like to expand on it. The single biggest improvement I made to my landscape photography is when I'd read about including something from the foreground to give your composition a feeling of depth. So way the 'tourists' may take a picture of a mountain lake with the water and the mountains behind, try to include something nearer to the camera in the frame, maybe a fallen log on the near shore line, or an interesting rock formation or flowers in the corner of the frame. You need to remember that this object is not the key element of the shot, but more of something to guide the viewer's eyes into the shot. |
|||
|
|