Time to be with your loved ones

Time to be with loved ones

by sat

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've always wondered looking at photographs of shiny Christmas ornaments...how were those photos taken without reflecting the photographer or the camera setup?

These days, I can imagine that digital manipulation can easily erase the reflections.

But what about in the old days? In my mind, shooting through a 45-degree angled two way mirror would do the trick, but am I over complicating the setup? How was this done?

Thanks!

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 8 down vote accepted

Unless the photos you're thinking of were retouched, whatever you see reflected in the ornaments is the photographer's setup. The trick is to make that look like something other than a photography studio. That means two things: 1) provide the environment that you want reflected, and 2) hide or camouflage the things (like the camera) that you don't want to see. To accomplish that, you can set up some props such as a bowl of fruit, a vase of flowers, pine branches, etc. to create the environment you want. A studio soft light can be modified to look like a window, or you can just use a real window for light. The camera can be hidden among the props or concealed (except for the lens, of course) behind some black cloth so that it blends into the scene, and a remote trigger can be used to keep the photographer out of the scene.

A long lens can help, too: with spherical objects like Christmas tree balls, reflected objects become tiny very quickly as distance increases. For example, using a 100mm macro lens instead of a 50mm macro lets you get the camera twice as far away from the subject, and that makes the camera's reflection much smaller.

share|improve this answer
    
I seem to recall definitely having seen closeups of Christmas tree balls that didn't have obviously (or surreptitiously) camouflaged setups. Thanks for the answer. –  marc Dec 27 '12 at 23:10
1  
@Caleb, great answer, I love the idea of hiding yourself within the photo! I guess having the camera on timer of using a remote means you just have to hide the camera though! –  AidanO Feb 28 '13 at 15:47
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.