Open

by damned truths

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Are there any consumer grade (i.e. not ridiculously expensive scientific equipment) digital cameras that use "grayscale" sensors instead of the prolific RGGB bayer filter? I figure that you'd get an extra stop or so of light if you weren't cutting out everything except the red/green/blue at each pixel. I've seen that some companies stock sensors by themselves but I'm not about to build my own camera from parts - though I wouldn't be averse to removing the bayer filter from a cheap enough camera.

share|improve this question
    
By "grayscale" I mean that I intend the sensor to capture the brightness of the light, regardless of its wavelength. I am probably not using correct terminology here - feel free to correct me. –  Jono Dec 24 '12 at 18:53
    
You can buy some Canon DSLRs with their Bayer filters removed from MaxMax. They aren't cheap. –  Evan Krall Dec 24 '12 at 21:49
1  
"Grayscale" is correct enough. One might also say "monochrome" or "luminosity only". Or, commonly "black and white" (even though that's technically less correct). –  mattdm Dec 25 '12 at 3:16

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Right now, no. Leica recently announced a monochrome version of the M9 digital rangefinder, but it is expensive (about $8000). Long ago, Kodak made a black and white version of its 760 DSLR (based around a Nikon F5 body), but that was also priced at around $8000, not aimed at the general consumer market. There have been persistant rumors that Ricoh will produce a B&W module for the GXR modular system, but nothing has materialized yet.

You're right about the advantages of a monochrome sensor, but there's two big reasons I think we're not likely to see this in the mass market:

First, modern sensors have great high-ISO performance and high resolution.

Second, starting with a color image allows very versatile black and white conversion in post processing. Traditionally, one might use a red or other colored filter with black and white film to get a specific look. If you start with a color image and do digital conversion later, you can choose the blend of wavelengths visually after the fact.

There's always demand for more extreme performance, so if it were just the first, there might still be a market, but the second means that it's going to be a niche market.

share|improve this answer
    
PS: there's been some good discussion of this over the years at The Online Photographer blog. For example, this series –  mattdm Dec 24 '12 at 19:37

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.