Before the rush

Before the rush
by evan-pak

Submit your Photo
Hall of Fame

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a 28 - 135 mm Ultrasonic; the mechanism for the auto focus has failed, and there is some plastic bouncing around inside.

Is it worth repairing this lens?

Second question, assuming I don't get it repaired, I would like to replace it, but can't decide between the following:

  • EF-S 18-135 IS STM
  • Or replacing like for like (i.e. 28-135mm ultrasonic).

And lastly will either lens work with a full-frame 5D and the non-full-frame 7D?

share|improve this question
The EF-S mount question is covered here:… – mattdm Oct 9 '12 at 10:29
Hi there and welcome to photo.SE! You're unlikely to get helpful answers to this question as it stands for a couple of reasons: you're really asking 3 questions in one; you're not telling us everything we need to know (For example, what's your budget for the repair? What do you want to do with a replacement lens? etc.); and lastly, you're repeating questions that have already been asked. I recommend you follow @mattdm's link for the EF-S question then come back and edit this to make it easier to answer. – Mark Whitaker Oct 9 '12 at 12:21
Have you called Canon or gone on their website for a repair estimate? What is the current price of this lens if you had to pick up a new or used one? These would be good things to look into to help make this decision. – dpollitt Oct 9 '12 at 13:00

The EF 28-135 was the kit lens on bodies like the 50D. Its a better lens than the 18-55 F3.6-5.6 but its not a great lens. Its pretty slow.

The current used price on my local craigslist for the 28-135 is $200. You should check, but I expect the minimum repair cost is well over $100, so for me, its not worth fixing.

I replaced my 28-135 with the Canon 17-55 F2.8 and a 70-300. The 70-300 was $80 off craigslist. I love the 17-55 and the 70-300 is well worth what I paid for it.

share|improve this answer
I believe its an EF 28 - 135 not EF-s – Vivek Oct 9 '12 at 18:16
You are right, its an EF, not EF-S, still, its only $440 new at B+H, and its a very average lens. Works well in bright light, but too slow for far too much of my shooting – Pat Farrell Oct 10 '12 at 1:24
I am guessing you replaced the 28-135 with a 17-55 f/2.8 and not an 18-55 f/2.8. I'm not aware of an 18-55 f/2.8 for Canon. They have 18-85, 17-55, and 17-50(sigma), but nothing 18-55 f/2.8. – dpollitt Oct 10 '12 at 1:57

EF lens will work on full frame or non full frame cameras.

EF-S lens will work on crop sensors like the 7D,550D etc...

Exception for crop sensors are those tagged as pro cameras, they take EF lenses only.

share|improve this answer
Peng, thanks for that. – Eddie Oct 9 '12 at 8:50
Oh the EFS 18-135 is a good step up from the kit :D – Peng Tuck Kwok Oct 9 '12 at 8:52

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.