Incense

by Bart Arondson

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I know similar questions have been asked, but this is a little different I suppose. All files for our client need to be sized to max:9600px. I'm debating if I process from ACR with default sharpening, then upsize OR turn off sharpening in ACR, upsize, and then use un-sharpen mask. I'm going to test some files come monday but was wondering if anyone has any ideas/experience. The files are from a 39mp hassie back, so they're reasonably sharp to begin with. Not sure how big of a difference it will make in the end. Thanks for reading!

share|improve this question
    
possible duplicate of Resize and sharpen or sharpen and then resize? –  mattdm Oct 6 '12 at 17:46

3 Answers 3

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Resize and then sharpen is the answer.

It is commonly said that sharpening should be the last step. This make sense because you do not want to stretch the effects of sharpening. Sure you could do more complicated things but the lest steps are applied the less change there will be of seeing artifacts in the final image.

share|improve this answer
    
Awesome. That's what I thought but wanted a few other opinions. I'm incredibly happy to run into a photography forum of technically adept people! Thanks to you and StackOverflow! Wish I knew they had this photo forum earlier! –  rootsup Oct 7 '12 at 15:02

Some interpolation algorithms used when resizing have sharpening builtin, like Lanczos, but for extreme resizing, on an engineering level, it is actually a well known technique to blur the image first and then resize in multiple steps. Ie, sharpening might actually be in vain. So I'd go with Itai's suggestion: resize and then fix it up.

share|improve this answer

Itai has given you the correct answer - but there is also another way of thinking - with the same result.

By upsizing an image you will invariably add some blur - no matter how sharp the original image is. (How visible the blur is, is another matter depending on the algorithm used and amount of magnification.) Thus if you were to sharpen first and then upscale, you would need to sharpen it again. If you upscale the image first, you need to sharpen it only once - the fewer steps get you to your desired result, the better as the less chances there are of any steps degrading the quality.

Having said that though: For certain artistic effects, it might be effective to sharpen the images first. In the end you need to try yourself, but upscaling first and then sharpening once should give you the better result.

share|improve this answer
    
My initial worry was that high frequency areas would loose too much detail. Honestly still kind of a worry lol! I don't want textures getting lost. But come monday I'll try a little bit of all of it! Thanks for your input! –  rootsup Oct 7 '12 at 15:04

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.