Alley in Pisa, Italy

by Lars Kotthoff

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm considering uploading some of my photos to a stock photo website as a way of getting a few $$$ back from what's essentially been a hobby for me.

Is this a sensible step, or am I likely doomed to disappointment and failure with this approach?

share|improve this question
1  
I wouldn't set expectations for myself but it can't hurt to give it a go, right? –  Nick Bedford Aug 22 '10 at 22:27

4 Answers 4

up vote 32 down vote accepted

To answer your question, no, stock photos are not a viable source of income. You can make money off of it, just like some people who are able to write iPhone applications are able to make huge paydays; but in general the market is saturated, and unless you produce something that stands out amongst all the cruft, you won't be making much.

Think of it in terms of economics.

Supply and Demand.

Professional looking images required (in no particular order):

  • Equipment
  • Technique/Knowledge
  • Skill

And back in the day, all three were fairly hard to come by. Camera equipment was expensive (especially digital), you hard to find someone willing to teach you the ropes, and it took a long time to learn. Now a days:

  • Camera equipment costs necessary to produce professional looking images have dramatically decreased since the digital camera boom.
  • Likewise, computing power has become more powerful, and much more affordable, and image editing software has become much easier to use
  • The internet has made it incredibly easy to find information for learning how to produce quality images, as well as made it super easy to submit images for publication.

As such, the barrier to entry to producing quality images has been lifted nearly completely. With that, more and more people are able to produce nice images. One could say that stock photographs have become a commodity; there is no short supply of quality looking images.

Since the supply is very saturated, that drives the price down (while demand for stock photos has increased, it hasn't been to the scale as supply). Anyone with a digital camera and an internet connection can produce stock photos.

As Nick pointed out that as long as it doesn't cost you anything to submit your photos, you have nothing to lose.

This is outside your question, but if you want to make money off your photography, you're going to want to be creative and see what areas are underserved and target them. Assuming you are in the US, how about getting into real-estate photography--there is a huge glut of houses on the market and (at least when I was looking to buy a house) most have crap photos taken by real-estate agents. Another area, not for money necessarily--is to team up with animal shelters and do photos of the pets for adoption. Most shelters dont spend any time taking nice images, so volunteering your time will

  1. Increase your skill in pet photography
  2. Let you network and meet potential clients. After all they might want prof. photos done with their new family addition.
  3. Help with a great cause: helping find pets a forever place to live.
share|improve this answer
8  
+1. But don't forget that your time and effort is also a cost. –  Reid Aug 22 '10 at 23:19
    
Great point. I just assumed his time and effort were already sunk-costs due it being a hobby. –  Alan Aug 22 '10 at 23:40
    
Not unless you love doing it in the process, some would say. –  Nick Bedford Aug 23 '10 at 4:17
    
+1 for help with a great cause. –  ides Jan 1 '13 at 4:21

For the most part, no.

There are a decent number of photographers out there that make money with stock photos, but there are many many more who never really make enough to justify the time put into it.

That being said, if you're willing to spend the time, there is money to be made. If you decide to give it a try, take a look at these ideas to keep in mind for stock photos.

share|improve this answer
  1. Yes!

  2. But not the way you might hope. In other words, not usually from the type of photography you do as a hobby.

Stock photography, like any other kind of paying work in photography, has its own requirements and demands, and is usually quite separate from the kind of work you'd do as a hobby.

In other words, it's a job. Like a lot of jobs in photography, it's a job with a huge amount of competition, and the rewards are distinctly uneven and unpredictable.

Perhaps a topic for another question, but if you have a day job that satisfies, and want to make a bit of money back from the photography you enjoy, think about selling prints or exhibiting. If you want to work as a professional photographer, there are much better fields to get into than stock photography (especially microstock sites).

share|improve this answer

Every photographer has a chance to make money with stock, but it depends on many factors. Read this article, which I wrote specifically on this subject, you will find a detailed answer to your question there: Getting Rich with Stock Photography Part 1: Dream or Reality?

If you want to try yourself in stock photography, you need to be prepared to work hard. Apart from taking photos, you will need to do much more work, such as: thoroughly check the quality of every photo, post process it as necessary, add key words, upload to agencies as well as watching trends, constantly work on developing your skills and so on.
As I mention in the article stock photography should be taken seriously if one wants to earn income. Apart from the fact that your photos will bring you cash, stock photography makes you be more picky about quality in your photos, it makes you get into a habit to aim for the high quality in you work and this is a very good thing for every photographer.

share|improve this answer
2  
Hi Dina, and welcome. I can't help but notice that you came in and answered many questions about stock photography with very short answers linking to your blog, which has prominent referral links (i.e. links you get money from) to stock photography sites. Linking to your own blog is okay, but you should say so. Linking to your own blog almost exclusively is less okay. Please see the faq. Your writing seems good and I think you have a lot to contribute, but I hope you'll aim to add to what we have here, not just to drive traffic to your own. –  mattdm Feb 23 '12 at 13:31
    
In addition to disclosing your affiliation, you generally need to summarize your links in the answer. Hope to see you around! –  rfusca Feb 24 '12 at 4:10

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.