by ʇolɐǝz ǝɥʇ qoq

Submit your Photo
Hall of Fame

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm looking to try out macro photography and have a rental of the Canon 100mm 2.8L IS and the MT-24EX flash to try out on my Canon 7D.

I've been reading that with the flash, you can stop down to some seriously high f-stops for best DOF, but I haven't found much talk regarding diffraction issues. Is this not something to worry about with macro photography?

share|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Diffraction is a big issue in macro photography, however the usual guidelines don't apply. This is because depth of field is so shallow at macro distances. The increase in depth of field when shooting a very small aperture often more than makes up for the softness introduced at the plane of focus.

share|improve this answer
For a solution to both shallow depth of field and diffraction issues, try focus stacking. – ElendilTheTall Aug 28 '12 at 15:52
True. Sometimes you have to stop down to f/32 and focus stack... – Matt Grum Aug 28 '12 at 15:53
and sometimes focus stacking is not possible, e.g. when your subject is alive! – Matt Grum Aug 28 '12 at 16:12
oh, I don't know, I've seen quite a few focus-stacked insect macros in my time. – ElendilTheTall Aug 28 '12 at 17:56
@ElendilTheTall ah, but do you know for sure those insects were alive? – Matt Grum Aug 31 '12 at 10:59

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.