Incense

by Bart Arondson

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I need a wide angle lens for low-light/club photography with my Nikon D5000. I was going to pick up this one, but then I realized that it won't autofocus on my body. What is the closest equivalent in terms of price and performance that will?

share|improve this question
2  
Bear in mind that AF doesn't work very well in low light situations anyway - might open up a few more choices if you just go manual. –  ElendilTheTall Aug 17 '12 at 17:11

4 Answers 4

If you can try it out before buying, the Tokina 11-16 might still be the best option. It is less expensive than the Nikon 12-24. The Nikon is the runner up in my opinion. The two lenses are significantly different: the Nikon 12-24 is part of the 3 lens continuous zoom coverage set, the Tokina 11-16 is a Prime with wiggle room.

I say that the Tokina might be your best option since focus does not have to be very precise. The focus scale is 1/4 turn on this lens, it goes from 1ft to infinity. 2ft is over halfway across the scale. Another consideration is whether auto-focus will be effective in a club environment. It is probable that neither the Tokina or Nikon will auto-focus in a club without the af assist light on-- and that is so bright you will annoy people and disrupt your composition.

share|improve this answer

I own the Tokina 11-16. It's a great lens, but you'd be surpirised how wide the lens is. I use it on a D7000. Also, the limited zoom range (it's really wide even at the 16mm setting.) Unless you're literally a meter in front of the subject, it's going to look small.

Also - it's so wide, your flash won't light the whole frame.

I am looking to solve a similar problem to what you have - and I'm currently planning on purchasing the Nikon 17-55mm lens as the solution to the problem.

I've been testing the concept - standing at the back of the room with my 80-200mm 2.8 on my D7000, ISO at about 3000 and shooting around 1/60 - 1/100 sec. With Aperture at 2.8.

No flash - using the stage lighting only - it produces a fairly decent image. You can see the grain, but it's acceptable if you frame your shot well and don't have to zoom in too much.

share|improve this answer

You'll need an AF-S lens. Unfortunately most of the lenses available will be more expensive or have a smaller maximum aperture.

I think the Sigma is probably the closest in price/performance to the Tokina.

share|improve this answer
    
The Tokina is an excellent performer while the Sigma you mention here is not. The closest would be the Nikkor 12-24mm F/4, only a tad narrower and one stop less bright. It is very sharp from wide open though. –  Itai Aug 17 '12 at 12:01
    
Whatabout this lense? I would be worried about the relatively low maximum aperture, but the wide angel can't be beat and it's relatively inexpensive on Amazon. link Sigma 8-16 –  Taylor Huston Aug 17 '12 at 20:41
    
@Itai, yes, I own the 12-24mm, great lens, but it's a much more expensive lens. Very subjective this relative price/performance stuff :) –  MikeW Aug 18 '12 at 2:23

Tokina apparently makes a D5000 compatible version of your original lens.

http://www.amazon.com/Tokina-11-16mm-AT-X116-Digital-Cameras/dp/B007ORX8ME/ref=pd_cp_p_0

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.