Orquid "Phoenix"

Orquid "Phoenix"

by ceinmart

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I absolutely love the simple and clean interface and features that iPhoto and Aperture bring and I absolutely hate the "library/import" approach. I like to see my photos as files on a disk and that's that. Is it possible to just navigate through a drive in iPhoto and open images for editing or do I always have to import stuff?

share|improve this question
    
I had the same feelings, which was what led me to go with Lightroom instead. –  chills42 Aug 11 '12 at 4:13
add comment

5 Answers

You have to do the imports. The systems need to set up all of their information about the images somehow, after all.

So, start the imports and go do something else for a while. You're not required to sit and watch the imports. Let the computer do its thing, and then come back later when it's done.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Although storing your photos in folders is fast and simple, you can't place one photo into two folders without making file duplicates. And thus locating the necessary images might require more time.

So economy in a stage of image library classification will leads in loosing time in finding images later.

share|improve this answer
add comment

In Aperture, at least, you can import photos into the database but leave the files where they are. In the Import settings (when you click on the "Import" button), choose Store Files: In their current location (instead of "In the Aperture Library").

share|improve this answer
add comment

I am with you entirely. I hate having to do an import. I don't mind pointing an application at a folder that I have laid out. I can further sort within the app, add tagging, etc. But it had better not move my photos around.

I don't know of any way to do what you want with iPhoto.

Lightroom does indeed support a "folder" approach where that folder and everything under it is in the app for you to work on.

share|improve this answer
    
Is there any way to disable the "collection" feature in Lightroom? –  antonpug Aug 11 '12 at 22:58
    
@antonpug - Lightroom can do an import-in-place. It's one of the import options. –  Fake Name Aug 12 '12 at 22:53
add comment

Aperture yes as "referenced masters" — iPhoto no, it only supports its own library structure.

Aperture allows you to import photos as "referenced masters". You can do this from the import settings under the "Aperture Library" settings, by setting "Store Files" to "In their current location" (if already on your hard drive in your own storage system), or by selecting the appropriate folder for your folder-based-library. Note that you can also use the "Rename Files" setting to set up sub-folders (e.g. "YYYY/MMM/DD") as well as renaming the files as they're copied to the folder-based-library.

The same setting exists for "Import Folders as Projects" if you already have a project-based folder structure for your master photos.

Note that only the masters are getting stored in this structure, so you'll still need Aperture to browse your modified/processed images (unless you export to another folder structure).

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.