Not Your Everyday Banana

by Bart Arondson

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Possible Duplicate:
How to choose a lens for my first DSLR?

I am new in the world of photography. I bought a Canon 60D camera. With my camera I have no lens. Now I am really confused. After one day research I decided to buy a prime lens Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM. But I am not quite sure is it intelligent decision or not? I am little bit confused about this lens. Is it good for portrait photography? Looks like I am in trap. I am interested to buy mid range lens with reasonable focusing speed. Can any one give me a suggestion which one should I buy?

Here is my consideration points--

  1. focusing speed within 2 to 3.
  2. Prime or zoom lanes any one would be OK. I am thinking of prime lanes because of the it's image sharpness. But I am not sure. (Give me some suggestion)
  3. 20 to 150 mm zoom will be enough for me.
  4. I am student I do not have huge amount of money so cheaper and good quality lanes will be affordable for me.

Any suggestion would be appreciable. Thanks in advance.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by dpollitt, Itai, John Cavan, chills42 Jul 27 '12 at 20:00

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

    
Welcome to the site. This is probably covered in many other threads here. Basically I think you are asking "what first lens should I buy" which pretty much every aspiring photographer thinks at some point, so we have great examples of this question already being answered here. –  dpollitt Jul 24 '12 at 16:59
1  
See also photo.stackexchange.com/questions/4316/… , photo.stackexchange.com/questions/4047/… , and the entire [equipment-recommendation] tag which is full of very similar examples. The 100mm f/2.8 is a great lens, but it would be limiting for a first and only lens in my opinion. It is possible to use just that, and it is great quality, but it isn't a zoom and isn't extremely wide either. The 50mm f/1.8 is a very common choice for a first prime outside of the kit lens. –  dpollitt Jul 24 '12 at 17:02
add comment

2 Answers 2

up vote 2 down vote accepted

As dpollitt said, the 50mm would probably less limiting, especially if you ever plan to shoot indoors. Getting anything other that closeups on faces would require a rather large room. Even the 50mm could be a bit tight, but the 1.8 version is a real bargain.

You could also consider some of the EF-S lenses; there are several good all-round zoom lenses to choose from that also are cheaper than the full-frame ones. The "kit-lenses" (various versions of EF-S 18-55mm) have a bad reputation, but the others (EF-S) are not all as bad. Generally these lenses are also small and easy to carry around.

Since you mention a macro, the EF-S 60mm f/2.8 USM is supposed to be a very nice lens, and less expensive than the 100mm (and perhaps less limiting).

share|improve this answer
    
thanks.. for your ans.. what about Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM. I just found it with some reviews. Seems that, it would be a good option also, considering prime lens and reasonably focus. –  Shahjalal Jul 24 '12 at 23:46
1  
@Shahjalal - as has been pointed out in both this answer and the comments to your question, it's a matter of working distance. An 85mm lens on a Canon APS-C camera means you need to be 7-8 feet (call it about 220-250 cm) away from the subject for a head shot (farther to include more of the subject), and you likely want to have the subject some distance away from the background as well (if for no other reason than to avoid shadows). Including room behind the camera for yourself and space for lights and reflectors, you'd need a large room to make an 85mm work indoors for portraits. –  user2719 Jul 25 '12 at 0:54
add comment

you can look for Sigma 18-50mm f2.8 its much cheaper that canon's 17-55mm f2.8 and quality at par with it.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.