Taking into consideration price, what are the best macro lenses for not-to-serious photography? Price is a big factor for me.
And I know it is a subjective question. I do not mind subjective answers.
Tell me more
×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for
professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.
|
closed as not constructive by jrista♦ Jul 3 '12 at 1:14
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or specific expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, see the FAQ for guidance.
|
The best would be to adapt a non macro lens, There are many ways to do this, lens reversal, extension tubes, etc... if you want to buy a macro lens, for a $500 price tag you can get the older 100mm f/2.8 you can read a review here, also for about the same price you can get the Sigma 70mm f/2.8, however, I would go with the Canon. |
||||
|
|
