Open

by damned truths

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am a beginner in Photography and this would be my first DSLR.

I am confused whether to go for the Nikon D3200 or Nikon D5100. I would be taking mostly portraits and would need a camera which would take better pictures in low light. Also I will go on treks, hill trips often and it should be the best in snapping those landscapes.

Please suggest me the best option to go with.

share|improve this question
2  
If you're concerned about pics in lowlight, get the 35mm f/1.8 or the 50mm f/1.8 and get whichever camera fits your leftover budget. –  rfusca Jun 5 '12 at 18:04
    
@rfusca - Those are probably a little wide for portraits. The 50 is so-so on a crop for this, but the 35mm is really a non-starter there. Also, neither are especially good for landscape because they aren't very wide. –  John Cavan Jun 6 '12 at 2:20
    
@John The 50mm is fine for portraits, maybe not optimal like an 85mm, but fine. The 35mm is fine for everything but headshots and even then it doesn't show too much perspective distortion. For exampe: photo.blogoverflow.com/2012/05/portrait-perspective . Well for starting out landscapes, the kit lens with VR is probably your best bet - so I didn't bring that up. –  rfusca Jun 6 '12 at 2:48
    
@rfusca - I hear ya, but I'd still go longer than 50mm and 35mm wouldn't be in my list. Like I said, a little wide for portraits, but that doesn't mean fisheye distortion. :) –  John Cavan Jun 6 '12 at 3:10
    
I mean ya, if you're going to get a specialized portrait lens. The new Nikkor 85mm f/1.8G is amazing. I got it and sold my 50mm - but I'm hesitant to offer that as the first lens for somebody. –  rfusca Jun 6 '12 at 4:16

3 Answers 3

As far as low light portraits go, these cameras are very very similar. The D5100 is a somewhat older model, and it is reaching the end of it's lifespan. The D3200 is basically brand new. I would take a look at some high ISO comparisons here. This will give you an idea of how closely they do perform at high ISO shots.

Beyond that, the D3200 is a significant boost in megapixels, and if you plan to print very large images(ie landscapes) or blow up small portions of the image, that might make the D3200 beneficial to you. The D5100 does have some higher end features if you think you may need them, such as controls for white balance and exposure bracketing.

Strictly speaking, they should perform very similarly for low light portrait work.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for the reply! DPReview is one of the sites which i did saw before getting into a dilemma. –  Gobind Vijay Jun 5 '12 at 17:56
    
One of the comments i got was 11 AF points is very less for 24 Mega pixels and they were mentioning it would affect the pics taken in low lights. Does this really apply ? –  Gobind Vijay Jun 5 '12 at 17:59
    
If the AF of the D3200 is like the D3100 - its pretty lacking. Not really in low light, just in general. Its my biggest gripe with the camera after having used it for 1.5 years now. However, I don't know how it compares with the D5100. –  rfusca Jun 5 '12 at 18:08

Others have handled the direct answer, but I think a more useful answer is to use more light. Cameras record light. They are really not see-in-the-dark devices.

For portraits, you don't want to have the subject in the sun, its too harsh, but you can take photos on cloudy days, or in the shade and get good results.

You don't have to spend much money, but you should get some lights. Off-camera strobes are a good place to start. The strobist site has tons of information, tutorials, etc. http://strobist.blogspot.com/

I strongly recommend that you not just buy Nikon's latest and greatest strobe and put it on the top of your camera body. Its a better flash than the built in one, but you want it off camera.

There is a decision between manual and automated strobes/flashes, addressing that is a topic that can fill a book.

share|improve this answer

A few days ago I came across the tests performed by DXO Labs. Note I have no affiliation with then but found their testing methodology, specifically for low light situations interesting at the very least. It seems to me to be a fairly objective measurement based approach that would be helpful when comparing one camera to another.

Looking at their data comparing the D3200 to the D5100 the test results look pretty close to me so I would probably make the decision on price or other features that you care about.

share|improve this answer

protected by John Cavan May 7 '13 at 3:36

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.