Here are some examples of what I mean on Flickr -- though I would be open to a better source of examples.
The basics is that you start with a 360-degree panorama and apply a rectangular to polar transformation.
I happen to have written introductory tutorials for both:
One easy short-cut is that some recent Fuji cameras actually can produce a seamless 360° panorama right in the camera. Make sure you choose the Cylindrical 360° option under the Motion Panorama function. Otherwise, or if your camera does not have it, then a seam will appear in the results.
As a starting point to finding a good answer, just found these tutorials:
There are actually two common types of "little planet" images: polar and stereographic. The ones asked about in this question are both. The one asked about in the linked "duplicate" post, How to do 360 polar pano in photography? is a stereographic "little sky". They have different requirements and techniques, but both typically begin with a stitched panorama that is then remapped to a different projection.
Polar Little Planets
A polar little planet is the easiest kind to make because you can do it with any image (if you don't mind a visible seam). If you want to eliminate the seam, you can start with a 360º pano (cylindrical (regular pano) or equirectangular (360ºx180º full spherical pano)), or mirror image your photo, and combine the two side-by-side so the left edge can wrap around and join seamlessly with the right.
You then perform three steps (either separately in Photoshop, or all at once with the Polar Coords filter in the Gimp):
This type of panorama will have a very circular world, without a lot of details outside that circle. If done with an equirectangular panorama, it looks like this:
Stereographic Little Planet
The other type of "little planet", which doesn't look so squashed to the center, requires an equirectangular 360x180 pano as the starting point. It can be created in Hugin, with the Mathmap plugin in the Gimp, or with the Photoshop Flexify plugin. This is a conformal mapping, where angles are preserved, so proportions are more recognizable and things aren't so squashed-to-the-circle.
In Hugin (2013):
It will look more like this:
"Little planets" are done by starting the stereographic mapping at the "south pole" of the sphere (pitch=-90). You can make "little skies" (or tunnels) by starting the mapping at the "north pole" (pitch=90):
Obviously, you can also create side tunnels starting your mapping at the equator (pitch=0), but the effect is rarely as eye-catching as the planet/tunnel configurations.
Creating the starting 360ºx180º equirectangular pano, however, is a very involved process often requiring specialized equipment. Most typically, they're made by using a fisheye lens for maximum scene coverage and minimum stitching. The camera is rotated in yaw to cover the horizontal field of view, and then rotated in pitch to cover the zenith (straight up) and nadir (straight down) shots. To avoid parallax error in small spaces, tripods with special panoheads are often used to rotate the camera/lens combination in portrait orientation around the lens's no-parallax point in both axes. Careful use of a plumbline and good can sometimes work, but handheld equirectangulars are generally only successful for outdoor shots without close-by objects.
The member images are then stitched together in an application that can handle both the fisheye distortion and full spherical coverage. While Microsoft ICE and other stitchers can be used for this, it doesn't offer as much control over the stitch as the PanoramaTools GUIs, like Hugin and PTGui do.
To learn more about shooting and stitching 360x180 panos, the panoguide.com forums , Eric Rougier's From Paris website's technical articles, and John Houghton's tutorials on PTGui are all fantastic resources.
And little planets are just the beginning of how you can remap 360x180s.
Peirce Quincuncial mapping with Drostify option; done in the Gimp with the Mathmap quincuncial script.