Serene Life

by garik

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have seen a lot of posts lately about the Brenizer method. It looks smashing, but at the same time, I am fairly certain I could recreate the look using blurred layers in Photoshop. Apart from having a high-resolution picture using Brenizer's technique, are there other advantages I'm missing from just taking one wide-angle shot and manipulating it in PS to mimic the look?

share|improve this question
    

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Most techniques that are 'properly' accomplished in-camera, but can also be approximated in software, are generally better in-camera. No software filter can replicate the quality of bokeh afforded by a good-quality lens (although Photoshop's Lens Blur filter does a decent job).

Having said that, the Brenizer method is relatively time consuming, both in the field and in the computer, and requires a fast lens, so whether or not you do it 'properly' or with straightforward blurring really depends on what you're doing with it. If you're just taking a family portrait shot, you may as well 'cheat'. If you're taking a shot for your portfolio or for a professional wedding shoot, it's worth going the whole hog.

share|improve this answer
    
They are comparing one post processing technique to another, neither option is in camera. –  dpollitt May 24 '12 at 17:27
    
The shallow depth of field and multiple exposures are in-camera, the shots are then just stitched together in post processing. –  ElendilTheTall May 24 '12 at 17:50
    
@ElendilTheTall, this is pretty much what I was thinking in terms of why I'd ever use the Brenzier method. So I'm not missing anything really other than 'photo-geek drooling-grade bokeh' and a larger final image, correct? –  huzzah May 24 '12 at 18:09
    
Well, that's subjective. The only way to be sure yourself is to try both methods and see if you care much about the difference. –  ElendilTheTall May 24 '12 at 18:19
    
True. Thanks for your advice! –  huzzah May 24 '12 at 18:51

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.