Serene Life

by garik

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have had a trivial question for a long time. I can't understand how you can take a picture of outside of a thing, when you are a very small dot in it.

Really, how did they take these pictures of the Milky Way? Are they real pictures at all, or just some computations and imaginations?

share|improve this question
    
you can take a picture of a barrel from inside it, cant you? And by analyzing that picture you can even extrapolate how the barrel looks from outside. –  Elzo Valugi Mar 28 '12 at 6:46
    
We may not be able to observe our galaxy from the outside but we can observe other galaxies that we believe to have a similar structure and so we can extrapolate what our galaxy would look like. –  damned truths Apr 13 '13 at 13:04

5 Answers 5

up vote 23 down vote accepted

Traditionally it has been mostly imagination because the absorption by interstellar dust clouds prevents us from seeing, in visible light, beyond a zone in the Milky Way that is only about 20% of the distance to the center of the galaxy. That is only about 4% of the entire disk of the Milky Way was visible. Of course, we can see indefinitely far when we look out of the plane, but then our lines of sight pass out of the Milky Way disk.

In the mid-20th century, radio astronomy allowed us to see interstellar matter across the entire galaxy, in the form of the 21-cm spectral line (1.4 GHz) of neutral atomic hydrogen (HI). We could then see evidences for giant spiral arms, but distance determinations to the interstellar gas are very approximate, so we could just get a general idea of what it might look like, as viewed by an outside observer. Later, detailed observations of the 2.6-mm spectral line (115 GHz) of interstellar carbon monoxide (CO), mostly located in molecular hydrogen clouds, gave us a more detailed insight since molecular clouds define the spiral arms of our galaxy much more closely than do the more diffuse clouds of neutral hydrogen.

Since the emission of HI and CO is in the form of spectral lines, we can determine the radial velocity (speed towards or away from us) of each emitting cloud from using the Doppler effect. Using a model of galactic rotation, we can then make a map of the spiral arms over the entire galaxy.

But these were still very approximate because (1) each cloud has its own motions which cause a distance error when comparing observations with the model and (2) there are two possible distances corresponding to a given radial velocity for portions of the galaxy closer to the center that we are.

So we knew of large spiral arms and roughly where they were, but the detailed picture was still mostly imagination.

More recently, detailed observations in the infrared have allowed us to see deeply into regions of recent star formation all through the galaxy. These regions of recent star formation define the spiral arms much better than the observations of interstellar gas, but a lot of work involving comparison of both infrared, radio, and microwave observations is needed to come up with a good general picture. See A Map of the Milky Way for a good view of our current understanding of what the Milky Way galaxy might look like as viewed from outside.

share|improve this answer

Our pictures of the Milky Way Galaxy are mainly based on maps of our galaxy's spiral arms obtained from radio astronomy, from the 21-cm line of neutral hydrogen. This was first done over 50 years ago, and has been refined over time. In addition, the pictures are enhanced through our knowledge of the many other spiral galaxies we observe around us.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy#Modern_research

share|improve this answer

They are to some extend 'artist interpretations', but also to some extend true representations. We can observe the galaxy from within, and based on the data we can observe we can construct a representation of the same data as seen from outside -- just in the same way as you can sit in your car and observe the traffic jam in front of you, and you can with that observation make a very good picture in your mind of what it would look like from a helicopter.

share|improve this answer

They're just imaginations based on estimates taken from star density (to determine we're in a barred spiral galaxy) and observations of what other similar galaxies look like. There's no way we could get a probe far enough out to take a picture of the entire galaxy.

share|improve this answer

Just to point out something obvious that the other answers haven't mentioned: you can take pictures of the Milky Way from inside it. In fact, it's a lot easier than taking pictures of other galaxies — to get started, all you need is a decent camera, an equatorial tracking mount (technically optional, but highly recommended) and a dark night.

Here's a particularly nice one, courtesy of the ESO:


(Image by ESO / S. Brunier, via Wikimedia Commons; used under the CC-By 3.0 license)

They just don't look very much like the pictures of other galaxies that we see from the outside, although, with a bit of imagination, you can detect a certain resemblance.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.