A field in Denmark

A field in Denmark

by Bart Arondson

submit your photo


Picture of the Week Themes
Suggest and vote on themes

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Tell me more ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.
up vote 1 down vote favorite

This is kind of a lame question, but I'm wondering if the back of the case for the Nikon SB-400 have a loop to carry it on a belt or strap. The model number for the case is SS-400 and looks like this:

http://www.pbase.com/image/88383398

Thanks.

share|improve this question

2 Answers

up vote 2 down vote accepted

I have an SB-400, just can't locate it at the moment! Will update with a definitive answer once I've found it! Almost certain that jaquer is correct and there isn't one. It's a tiny unit, not much bigger than a pack of cigarettes, and the case is very snug. You can put the whole thing in a pocket, it's that small, or simply leave it on the camera.

share|improve this answer
Thanks. I don't really like answering my own questions, so I will mark yours as the correct one as soon as you confirm. – jaquer Apr 27 '12 at 14:50
I am still looking for that little sucker. Used it a few weeks ago, probably in a jacket pocket. Haven't forgot, will update eventually! – MikeW Apr 27 '12 at 19:31
I ended up buying the case. Just like j-g-faustus says up there: no loop. Thanks! – jaquer May 8 '12 at 6:42
I have still not found it, I think someone must have borrowed it and I've forgotten. I think you should accept your own answer, I was no help in the end! – MikeW May 8 '12 at 18:42
Found it! No loop! :) – MikeW Jun 10 '12 at 1:25
up vote 3 down vote

Nope, it looks like it doesn't. I ended up doing a YouTube search for SB-400 videos, to see if anyone mentioned it. I didn't find any videos explicitly talking about the cover, but these links briefly show the cover's back, and there is no loop visible:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5ZpP2gv5uE#t=115s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hv8Q92qMcuk#t=8s

share|improve this answer
1  
I have one, and you're right: No loop. – j-g-faustus Apr 25 '12 at 0:35
Thanks for the answer. I'm giving MikeW the credit because I don't like to self-answer. – jaquer May 8 '12 at 6:40

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.