Before the rush

Before the rush
by evan-pak

Submit your Photo
Hall of Fame

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

How can I create photographs with the characteristics of this image?

enter image description here

share|improve this question
What 'effect' in the image are you specifically looking to replicate? What qualities? – rfusca Apr 17 '12 at 15:36
the whole look of it really. The black sky and then the white middle with the grey water. To get the water so smoooth, do I use a long exposure? – heyred Apr 17 '12 at 15:53
Are you looking to do it in camera, in post, or whatever works? – rfusca Apr 17 '12 at 15:58
Rohan Reilly does photography in this style, and often includes technical information on Flickr, e.g. He uses a strong neutral density filter (mentioned in other photos) to achieve the 1-2 minute exposure times. – coneslayer Apr 17 '12 at 16:27
up vote 19 down vote accepted

There are several effects going on here.

  • The water effect must be done in camera, with a very long exposure. Probably during dusk or at night otherwise you'll have too much light, even with a strong ND filter.

  • The black and white conversion can be done in camera if shooting JPEG but is better done in post.

  • The gradient in the sky is either done with a coloured filter (e.g. red or organge), a graduated ND, or in post. It could also just be atmospheric conditions.

  • Soft lighting comes from an overcast sky.

share|improve this answer
The dark sky could also be an effect of shooting in infrared. The sky looks dark in IR, with a gradient like that at the horizons, as the thickness of the atmosphere begins to overwhelm the sky. – Fake Name Apr 17 '12 at 20:47
Is there any reason you couldn't stack neutral density filters to extend exposure times arbitrarily long? Also, would multiple filters even be strictly needed? For visual observation of the Sun through a telescope/binoculars you can get filters that reduce brightness by 100,000x. I'd think that would be sufficient to allow multi-second daylight exposures without doing anything else. – Dan Neely Apr 17 '12 at 21:20
@Dan stacking ND filters eventually causes colour shifts and loss of sharpness, and vignetting on full frame. I would question the affect on image quality of shooting through a filter designed for viewing the sun. To get the sea that flat you need to expose for about 15 minutes, not a few seconds! I've seen a few shots like this and they were all done at night. – Matt Grum Apr 18 '12 at 7:06
@MattGrum Baaders AstroSolar filter material is supposed to have a neutral color balance (other common filter types do have major color balance shifts); but a quick search didn't turn up any numbers for how strict their definition of neutral is. – Dan Neely Apr 18 '12 at 15:45

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.