Orquid "Phoenix"

Orquid "Phoenix"

by ceinmart

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is YN-460 Yongnuo worth it? Found it for 34 EUR http://bit.ly/GE1Tdp

Fist of all: is it so cheap I will regret I bought it and just withdraw using it?

In my understanding and for I would use limitations are:

  • no radio trigger. I would need to use optical one. I read that it might not work well in the sun, etc. Does is usually work with some flaws or does it usually not work? :)

  • It doesn't have i-TTL I didn't really know how it works, but I guess I can have better control and possibly better results just setting all the things by myself. How complicated is it to do calculations and setup? Do i need to mesure distance of the subject for it?

share|improve this question
    
Most weak flashes don't work well in bright sunlight. –  J. Walker Mar 21 '12 at 17:53
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 5 down vote accepted

I have a YN-462 and a Nikon SB-600 so I'll comment a bit. There's a clear quality of product between the two. The Nikon feels better better and solid. However, functionally, when they're both in manual mode on a stand, they both work fine and consistently.

Manual for flash is not hard at all - once you do it a few times, you start to get a feel for it. Then you'll setup, take a test shot or two and only have to make minor adjustments.

You absolutely can use radio triggers with them - I use these cheap ones and love them.

One caveat about cheap flashes - most of them are weaker in strength than a more expensive flash. This could result in slower recharge times because you're doing a full pop instead of a half pop or just having insufficient power. Much of this will be determined by how you use it, its not been an issue for my style of photography.

share|improve this answer
    
+1 for the CowboyStudio trigger. It's simple, cheap, and works relatively well. –  zim2411 Mar 21 '12 at 22:28
add comment

Short answer: absolutely yes

Long answer: I have the YN-465, it's the TTL version of the YN-460 and it works great, it's powerful enough for everyday use and the light it gives out is just as good as the high end flashes.

Before I bought the YN-465 I used a borrowed high end flash for a different camera (a flash for Pentax on a Canon camera) so it was effectively a manual flash.

Manual flashes are actually easy to work with if you have time for a test shot or two, just set something take a test shot and adjust up or down, I could usually get the right exposure with just one or two shots and I'm not an expert.

Now, there is a clear difference between cheap and high end flashes, the build quality is different and the cheap flash is not nearly as powerful, if my income depended on the flash working I would definitely go for the expensive one but for hobbyist use the cheap YN flashes are great.

I don't know about the YN-460 optical trigger because the YN-465 doesn't have one - but optical triggers are known to be useless in direct sunlight and when you don't have a clear line of sight between your on-camera flash to the off camera flash - so I wouldn't expect much.

You can get radio triggers on eBay for less than $15, I've used a borrowed set of cheap radio triggers for a few months and they worked perfectly almost all the time (but not all the time - and when they don't work you better have a backup plan). Now that I had to return the borrowed radio triggers I will be buying a set for myself.

share|improve this answer
    
The backup plans always include a PC-sync cord as the last resort. I shot off-camera-flash for nearly two years using a cheap PC-sync cord. Works great. Of course, being tied with a cord has obvious downsides that radio and light-triggered remotes are free from. –  Pat Farrell Mar 21 '12 at 19:38
    
@PatFarrell - my backup plan for radio trigger failure is putting the flash on camera and bouncing it - but I usually photograph family events with lots of running children, a PC-sync cord it an accident waiting to happen in those situations –  Nir Mar 21 '12 at 22:07
add comment

I use manual flashes all the time. The universal source for off-camera manual flashes is Strobist: http://strobist.blogspot.com/

Up until last week's Canon announcement, all of Canon and Nikon's remote flash triggers were done using light, not radio. They all have the same issues.

In all cases, you can use a cheap PC-sync cord for sync even in bright sun.

Manual flashes require you to set the power level manually. You do not need a meter. You do not need to calculate anything. Just set it up, make a test shot and look at the histogram on the back of your camera. Adjust to suit.

I use LumoPro LO160s, they are about $150 each. They work great.

share|improve this answer
    
Men, I never thought that Canon and Nikon are infrared and not radio. Sometimes I wonder if their success is completely deserved :) –  Paolo Mar 21 '12 at 15:58
    
Joe McNally is a world class photographer that teaches using the Nikon CLS system. Amazing work. But it does not work 100% of the time, and even for him, sometimes you have to use manual. –  Pat Farrell Mar 21 '12 at 19:35
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.