by ʇolɐǝz ǝɥʇ qoq

Submit your Photo
Hall of Fame

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a Nikon 18-200 VR which I think is great. I often use the 200mm part of it so I'm thinking of an even more extreme superzoom, but I'm not familiar with other lenses than Nikon, but I have been thinking about Tamron 18-270.

Has anyone experience with this lens? I have not seen any good reviews of it or comparisons with the Nikon 18-200? How do they compare?

Also, are there any other alternatives? I saw a superzoom in a magazine some weeks ago that went from 16-xxxmm and that could also be interesting.

share|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

I've got the Tamron 18-270 for my Canon, and very happy with it.

share|improve this answer
Will give it a try. I think this is the only obvious choice. A 70-200 is not a superzoom. – grm Aug 21 '10 at 16:52
If you are thinking about going Full Frame in the future, there's also a 28-300, which a colleague of mine had for his Canon 5D and was very happy with it too. – Daniel O Aug 21 '10 at 22:22

There's a new Nikon 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR lens you might consider for about $1000. Ken Rockwell loves it.

share|improve this answer
Thanks. Saw it. Only problem is the need for a d700 ontop of that :) – grm Oct 14 '10 at 6:22

The 16-xx you're thinking of may be the Tokina 16.5-135 which was announced a year or two ago; available at B&H for $450. It's a nice focal range in general but not if you're wanting more than 200mm.

Note that the 18-200's internal focus design means that when focusing close, it's considerably shorter than 200mm. So it could be that a real 200mm would meet your needs.

You might also consider a zoom which is longer but less super, such as the 70-300 VR or the AF-D version which is not VR but is very inexpensive ($150).

share|improve this answer

The full frame for Tamron 28-300 is actually getting a pretty good review (check Amazon). Here is the dpreview lens review for Tamron 18-270 (ASP-C): DPREVIEW (not bad for a super zoom)

share|improve this answer

I was in a similar situation, and I decided to get a used 70-200mm f/2.8 and the Nikon TC-17E teleconverter. It is a pretty pricey solution, but the lens is great!

See my somewhat related question here

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.