Forgotten in its old age

by Aditya

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm visiting the mountains of La Plagne in France. I'm hoping to get some nice photographs of the snow covered mountains while I'm there. I'm thinking of getting some filters for to use with my Cokin filter kit. Any advice on what to get? I'm thinking neutral density filters, but not sure about which types or densities to get.

share|improve this question
3  
.6 and or .9 ND Grad filters would be the first items if I were packing for that trip. You could also add a standard ND filter and a circular polarizer. –  dpollitt Mar 5 '12 at 14:51
    
@dpollitt answer with that, I'd upvote. –  ElendilTheTall Mar 5 '12 at 15:03

1 Answer 1

Assuming you are shooting digitally, a polarizer should be all the filter you really need. This can reduce contrast in the scene my making the sky darker, depending on the angle of the sun. It will also reduce glare from the snow.

You may also consider a solid ND filter if you wish to do long exposures. You can do this to include climbers are night as they trace paths through the mountain with their lanterns or head-lamps. Since you get a clear view of the sky at altitude, you may also do star-trials.

Facing mountainous terrain, there is little use for a graduated ND filter since the transition on the filter is unlikely to match anything natural in the scenery. Instead, you can probably experiment with exposure fusion.

If you are shooting film, then you can add a Skylight or UV filter to reduce the blue tint caused by high-altitude UV rays. Digital sensors no not have the UV problem and compensate for tint via white-balance which you can get manually to get perfect results.

share|improve this answer
1  
Really? I thought that snow covered mountains usually line up just fine with a Grad ND. It does depend a bit, but I thought it would still be useful. –  dpollitt Mar 5 '12 at 15:28
    
Thanks for the advice. I already have a circular polariser filter, so I'm sorted there. As for ND filters, is it worth getting a range of densities or can one get by with one or two? I've seen 2x, 4x and 8x. –  Dan Stevens Mar 5 '12 at 15:29
1  
@dpollitt - I've never seen snow end in a straight line except when the plow just passed :) –  Itai Mar 5 '12 at 19:22
    
@IAmAI - The mid-strength ones are more useful I find, 8X or 16X. Plus, the polarizer gives you 1 to 2 1/2 stops of darkening too, so you can combine both to increase the attenuation if needed. –  Itai Mar 5 '12 at 19:25
    
@IAmAI - Many times you can stack polarizers and ND filters to achieve a higher value, but you may get vignetting. I would start with a 2 stop, but you could also get a variable one if you really wanted to. –  dpollitt Mar 5 '12 at 19:27

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.