Forgotten in its old age

by Aditya

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I read that teleconverters don't work with macro lenses. Is that true, and if yes, why?

I have the Canon 100mm f/2.8L macro lens, and I felt that purchasing a 2x teleconverter would be a cheap way of getting a good 200mm lens.

Some suggest placing an extension tube between the teleconverter and the lens, but that is no good for my use, as I would loose the ability to focus to infinity.

share|improve this question

3 Answers 3

up vote 7 down vote accepted

Yes they work, I'm sometimes using one with my 100mm non-L macro with good results. However, there is a caveat: Canon and Sigma teleconverters do not work because they physically do not fit. There is a protruding bit at the front of the converter that fits into a corresponding cavity on the back of the lens - and only certain L Canon lenses have this. This means the various 70-200s and the longer tele primes, as far as I know. I don't know if the 100 L macro has this opening, from photos I've seen of it it does not look like it.

I am using a Kenko brand 1.4x teleconverter thas does not have this protrusion, which makes it fit just about any EF lens you'd care to mount it on. I put it on a 17-40L once, for laughs. They do make a 2x converter too. Basically the same products are sold under the Kenko, Tamron and Soligor brand names.

share|improve this answer
    
Based on your reply, I ordered a Kenko 2x teleconverter and I have just fired a few test shots, and it seems to works beautifully. Autofocus seems to work fine. I had a few blurry pictures, but also some very sharp ones. Autofocus even works on an f/4 lens, which I didn't think it would. Now I just need to save up for a 300mm f/4 :D –  Pete Feb 22 '12 at 16:26
    
An f/2.8 macro plus a 2x teleconverter only gives f/5.6, which is still fine for autofocus. With an f/4 lens you are at f/8 which is not, I suspect that the camera does not recognize the presense of the off-brand TC. Check the EXIF, if it reports the "native" focal length of the lens and not the actual double focal length, the TC is invisible to the camera. –  Staale S Feb 22 '12 at 16:58
    
The camera sees both the double focal length and the double aperture. But now I also read the documentation with the converter, and it specifies that the 1.4x supports AF f/5.6 lenses, and the 2x converter supports AF for f/4 lenses. Don't know why cause, as you say, the camera requires minimum f/5.6 for autofocus to work. But it does work, so I am happy. –  Pete Feb 22 '12 at 20:43
    
Then I suppose maybe it does like some f/3.5-6.3 superzooms and blithely lies to the camera: "I have a maximum aperture of f/5.6! Really I do!!" –  Staale S Feb 22 '12 at 21:32

The canon 2x tc does not work with 100 2.8 macro. Its 1mm too long. You need an extension then the canon tc.

The 1.4 canon tc will fit

share|improve this answer

Yes, they work well. They allow you to double your magnification, or keep the same magnification but double your working distance.

You'll of course have less light transmitted and due to the magnification more camera shake. I can't think of any reason people would say they don't work with macro lenses. Possibly when focusing at infinity the quality might not be as good as a non-macro lens, being they are optimised for close focus, whereas normal lenses as a rule are optimised for infinity focus.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.