Forgotten in its old age

by Aditya

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have a Panasonic Lumix GF3 with the stock 14-42 lens. I've been away from photography for some time now. I bought a Raynox DRC 250 macro and was wondering if I would achieve pretty good results with the stock GF3 lens or do I need a telephoto-style lens to get decent macro shots?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

With a macro converter like the DCR 250 you are going to be trying to balance between getting a workable depth of field (creatively interesting, but challenging) with longer lenses, and getting rid of vignetting when shooting wide.

I've found similar setups require a lot of care in setting up, but your stock lens should, especially when racked out, be able capable of capturing solid images.

Here are a few examples of images taken (not by myself) with similar setup to yours (all at 42mm) to give you an idea of what is possible:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/floydevansclan/6226432626/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/floydevansclan/6182453948/

share|improve this answer
    
Wow! Great pictures! I'm definitely getting one of these for my GX1. Where these pictures taken using the kit 14-42mm you say? –  Theodor Jan 25 '12 at 20:00
    
They aren't my images, but based on the EXIF data, and another note by the photographer, yes - they are both shot at 42mm f/5.6 with the kit lens. –  djboss Jan 26 '12 at 15:11

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.