Forgotten in its old age

by Aditya

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am an enthusiastic amateur photographer and have a Canon 350 D that I bought about 5 years back. I use this with a Tamron 17-50 2.8 lens, a Canon 50 mm 1.8 mm lens and a Canon 70-200 f 4.0 L lens (with a Canon 1.4 X extender). I like to do some bird photography and also landscapes. I am wondering if my camera body is dated now and if that is the limiting factor for the quality of images that I get from my telephoto L lens. How much improvement in image quality can I expect if I upgrade to EOS 550 D (which I can afford now)? Will the newer sensor and larger number of pixels translate into a noticeable improvement in image quality?

share|improve this question
    
Welcome to photo.stackexchange! My bird photography got significantly better after I read through this thread: community.the-digital-picture.com/showthread.php?t=2119 . It took a few weeks to get through the whole thread, but thinking more about exposure and composition (as well as being inspired by the thread to go out and take more pictures!) made a big difference in my pictures. –  drewbenn Dec 4 '11 at 22:12
    
Is there anything specific about your images that you would like to improve? (inspired by @Nir's answer) –  AJ Finch Dec 6 '11 at 16:08

3 Answers 3

up vote 5 down vote accepted

The difference can be huge or unnoticeable depending on how you use the camera - for example, the faster burst rate means nothing if you never use burst mode or can make a huge difference if you always shoot in burst mode - also better low light performance means nothing if you always shoot in bright sunlight.

You shouldn't be asking if the camera body is a limiting factor - you should be asking yourself what it is you don't like about your photos and then ask here how to fix the problem (and most likely the way to fix the specific problem does not require a new camera body).

But buying equipment is fun, you can always use the specs to rationalize buying a new body - just think of that wonderful full HD video of birds in flight you can make with the 550D (Important note: I believe shooting video of birds in flight with a DSLR is insanely difficult)

BTW: I have the 550D and I love it, I use it mostly indoors at higher ISO than people here are usually comfortable with and it produces great pictures.

share|improve this answer

Snapsort shows a clear comparison of the tech specs of both cameras. To highlight a few of the advantages of the 550D over your 350D (in no particular order):

  • Capture around 2.5x more detail in your photos.
  • Maximum light sensitivity is 2 f-stops better.
  • More than 9x higher resolution screen.
  • 10% better image quality.
  • 0.7 f-stops more dynamic range.
  • More than 30% faster continuous shooting.
  • Distinguishes more than 20% more colors.

The main benefit seems to be the higher resolution that will allow you more room to crop photos of birds.

A slightly faster burst rate, hi-res screen, better low light performance and video capabilities are additional benefits.

share|improve this answer
1  
Thanks, Abhimanyu. What I really want is how much real life difference all these technical differences work out to - a somewhat subjective opinion. Does sound like there will be a substantial difference based on your answer. I think the better LCD allowing better immediate review and the higher resolution which will help with crops will make a big difference. –  Raja Selvaraj Dec 4 '11 at 15:29
    
In terms of making the best out of your L series glass, you can see this link on DxOMark that compares how your 70-200 lens performs on the different bodies. –  Abhimanyu Dec 4 '11 at 15:42

For what it's worth, I too have a 350D. It's a great camera.

Oddly - even though many newer, better cameras have come out since I first received it back in 2006 - my 350D hasn't started taking worse pictures over the years. I'm not sure why that is - it surely couldn't be that the marketing for all the new cameras is misleading??

My other camera is a 5DmkII, but I still love the images I get with my 350D.
I only got the 5D because I specifically wanted a full-frame sensor.

My advice: only upgrade if you have a specific need.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.