The Sleeping Giant's Sea Lion

by Jakub

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Actually, yesterday I shot a photograph indoors with a tubelight (on the wall) and a flash on. The results were "too" boring. The flash had robbed away all the natural looks of the scene.

Does using normal light bulbs as compared to flash show some difference in the outputs?

share|improve this question
    
This is very similar to your earlier question What non-studio lights are best for photography? –  mattdm Oct 28 '11 at 12:46
1  
And see also some of the information in answers to What continuous light technology gives light most suitable for photo lighting? –  mattdm Oct 28 '11 at 12:48
    
@mattdm Actually, I didn't want stdio lights because I couldn't afford them, but I CAN afford a flash and was thinking about purchasing it till yesterday, when flash gave an horrible output. BTW, this is an on camera flash. –  TheIndependentAquarius Oct 28 '11 at 12:51
4  
On-camera popup flash or hotshoe flash pointed straight forward will give almost universally bad results. There's a couple questions here already about what to do about that. photo.stackexchange.com/questions/5853 springs to mind but there are others as well. –  mattdm Oct 28 '11 at 12:56
    
@mattdm thanks, you've been helpful. –  TheIndependentAquarius Oct 28 '11 at 13:04

4 Answers 4

up vote 13 down vote accepted

Maybe, but usually not. House lights have several disadvantages.

First and most importantly, the light from a flash is significantly brighter for its short duration. This allows you to use lower, less-noisy ISO settings and narrower apertures. The short burst of the flash pulse itself can also freeze motion better than a shutter, which is nice for sharpness.

In order to get the same level of output from an incandescent or fluorescent bulb, you'll need a lot of power — more than normal house lights, so you're in to making (or buying) a special setup of some sort. And if you're doing that, there are many special setups you can do using a flash as well.

That power, in turn, can be very hot, if you're using incandescent lights, which is not so good for your subject. Alternately, if you're using fluorescent tubes, you may have unpleasant color rendering issues to deal with. And the bright, constant light can make people's eyes contract so the pupils are tiny spots, which isn't what one always wants.

Sometimes, when you're going for a naturalistic, documentary look, artificial light can be a deal-breaker. But for many shots, it's very beneficial to modify the light in some way, even with just a reflector. Having a constant source of light makes it easier to see in advance how the light falls (and reflects) without taking test shots (or using the "model light" strobe feature of some flashes).

But, mostly, what you want to do is:

  1. Get your flash off-camera — ideally wirelessly. (Or, at least bounce it if you can't do that.)
  2. Get some basic light modifiers like an umbrella or softbox. They can be a bit clunky but are not really very expensive, and done right they will contribute to the look of the scene rather than stealing from it.

You should also experiment with balancing the flash output with the light that's already there — artificial indoor light or sunlight. That gives you a lot of creative control.

share|improve this answer
    
what is this "model light" feature you speak of? Can you show me in a link? –  dpollitt Oct 28 '11 at 18:37
1  
See pttl.mattdm.org/feature:modeling-light-option. In short, you push the button and it strobes the flash very quickly for a few seconds, emulating a continuous light source. This makes it easy to see where the shadows are going to be, although it's pretty annoying if you have an actual human subject. It's also a bit less useful in the digital world than it might have been before, because you can usually just take some test shots. –  mattdm Oct 28 '11 at 18:49
    
Wow, yea my flashes have that, I hit it on accident sometimes, but never questioned why it existed! Thanks for the info! Man is it bright! –  dpollitt Oct 28 '11 at 19:43

Also, if you want to shoot decent pictures indoors without a flash, you really want a lens with a wide aperture. This typically means fixed focal length — zoom lenses have more complicated and bulky mechanics that get in the way of just plain pulling in as much light through the lens as possible.

Try to get at least f/1.4, but if you can find a good and affordable f/1.2 or even f/1.0 (unlikely, I know) lens for your camera, go for it. I picked up a Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC HSM at a good price for my Nikon D70s some years ago, and I've been happy with it, but please don't consider this a professional review in any sense. My point is simply that it's amazing what a difference those few f-stops can make if you haven't tried it.

Of course, wide apertures come with their own disadvantages, chief among them being narrow depth of field. On the other hand, you can also use this to your advantage — a narrow DoF will blur out distracting background clutter (which is common indoors), and thereby help bring out the subject.

share|improve this answer
    
Good advice but not really an answer to this question.... –  mattdm Oct 28 '11 at 19:10
    
Well, the OP asked "does it make sense to use a normal house light bulb instead of a flash?" IMO, the wider your lens aperture, the more sense it can make. –  Ilmari Karonen Oct 28 '11 at 19:20
    
Okay, that makes sense. :) –  mattdm Oct 28 '11 at 19:25
    
Thanks @IlmariKaronen I am thinking of going for a 1.2F. –  TheIndependentAquarius Dec 8 '11 at 4:17

The ambient light sometimes retains the specific mood of the surroundings. For instance, in a restaurant or a club the lights are arranged to create the mood. Firing flash in such scenarios definitely disrupts the mood that otherwise would have been nicely captured in the image.

When in low light, a tripod serves the purpose and the image can be captured in available indoor light.

share|improve this answer
    
I'll try with a tripod, thanks. –  TheIndependentAquarius Oct 28 '11 at 12:29

To add to the previous post on mixing flash with ambient light - you will usually need to add gel filters to a flashgun to match its color to ambient light. There are standard ones with a greenish tint for fluorescent lights and an orange tint for incandescent lights. Otherwise. And of course your white balance camera setting (if taking jpeg photographs) will have to adjusted to match.

share|improve this answer
    
See How do I use gels to make my flash match the color of the ambient light? for more on this. :) –  mattdm Oct 28 '11 at 15:47

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.