Is an entry-level DSLR good enough for portrait photography?

Question

I'm looking into starting a small at home portrait photography business mostly as a hobby for now, and I'm wondering if the camera I have now (Nikon D3000) is good enough for portrait photography.

I've heard from a few friends who do portraits, weddings, etc. that most of the "photo magic" is really just handled in Photoshop, and how the camera is actually used, and the camera is not the only thing to think about.

Is there a flash or some other add-on I should purchase that will help the camera? I just have the onboard one now. I've signed up for a few classes at our local college, however they won't start for a month, so I want to get a head start on what I should look for in equipment.

Is this camera simply sub-par for this sort of work? Is there a better entry level camera I should look into?

Answer 1

Yes, it's "good enough" for someone getting started in portrait photography. Almost everything you'll need to learn is camera-agnostic. The one technical limitation that comes to mind with the D3000 is that the body doesn't have an autofocus motor, so you'll need to be using lenses that have AF motors in order to get autofocus.

From a lighting perspective, most folks doing portrait photography use an external lighting source of some sort such as a speedlight. You'll want to use this off-camera, which means either a flash sync cord or a radio trigger of some sort. That said, it's also possible to create good portraits using only natural light, it's just harder since you have less control.

There are cameras that would offer slightly easier controls, or flash triggering built into the camera, but they're a couple steps above entry level which is what you specify in your question. You'll be able to learn the basics of portraiture with the D3000.

Answer 2

I agree with the other answers, an entry-level camera is certainly capable or portrait photography, but I find it surprising nobody has mentioned yet that you'll need a portrait lens - a kit lens does not offer depth of field shallow enough for portraiture. As a bare minimum, for a Nikon the AF-S 50mm f/1.8G should do.

Another thing you might need is a backdrop, unless you already have a suitable spot in your home without any visual clutter. Cleaning background in post-processing is very tedious, it's much easier to achieve it before shooting. Actually, most things are easier and more fun to to do in camera; post processing is only a tool to add final touch to the pictures.

Answer 3

Entry-level DSLRs will do the job quality-wise, especially as with indoor portrait photography you should have very few low-light situations. However, image quality is not the only consideration when choosing a camera for professional use.

One of the major reasons higher-level equipment is more expensive is because it is better built - in other words built to last, day in, day out intensive use.

If you just want to test the waters in professional photography and you can only afford an entry-level DSLR for now, then by all means go for it, but if you can afford (or don't mind saving up for) a higher-level camera it will be well worth it.

Answer 4

Yes, an entry level DSLR is good enough. However you need to learn & master lighting before you can sell your pictures.

Weddings and studio shoots are completely different beasts. Wedding shoots are much more demanding and you might need a camera that which is better at AF and low light photography than most entry level camera are these days. Studio shoots are more controlled as you can setup the lights and practice before getting the subject/model in.

Oncamera flash is barely used by professional and used as a last resort when you have nothing at hand (which is why higher end cameras don't even have those). You need to learn how to use off camera lighting and what effect various light modifiers have on the resulting pictures. Lighting 101 is a must for any budding photographer..