India Point Park

India Point Park
by matt-ball                

Submit your Photo
Hall of Fame

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Does using a lens adapter change the field of view?

I recently bought a Sony NEX-5, an extra Minolta MD 50mm 1.7/f lens and a MD to E-mount adapter and I was wondering, as the adapter increases the distance between the sensor and the lens by ~10mm, does this effectively make my 50mm lens a ~60mm lens? Or am I just misunderstanding things?

share|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

The adapter bridges the gap in flange distance (distance between mount and sensor/film) between the NEX native E-mount (18mm), and the MD/SR mount (43.5mm). Therefore, the focal length of the MD lens isn't affected, it's still at its native flange distance from the sensor.

If you were to adapt an MD lens to a mount with longer flange distance (i.e. canon EF, 44mm), the net effect would be that of an extension tube, equivalent FoV but the focus range would shift, allowing a closer minimum focus (and therefore, increased maximum magnification) but losing the ability to focus on infinity.

However, your FoV IS affected by the APS-C-size sensor in the NEX-5, causing an effective 1.6x crop in FoV (about the same as an 80mm lens in your case).

share|improve this answer
That's very interesting about the crop factor, I hadn't really read up on that before. I guess that's why it can feel a bit claustrophobic when using that lens indoors. It does take some beautiful profile pictures but sometimes it feels like I need to be taking them from the other side of the room. Making me seriously consider also getting the 16mm 2.6/f Sony lens. – Ross Anderson Oct 20 '11 at 11:21
I have the 16/2.8 E-mount, as well as a bunch of MD lenses, and the pancake can't hold a candle to the manual lenses as far as optical quality is concerned, and autofocus at 16mm is pretty superfluous (even at f/2.8 the hyperfocal distance is about 4.5m, at reasonable apertures everying is in focus). Unfortunately it can be difficult (and expensive) to find true UWA for 35mm cameras (since they cast a larger image circle, a 16mm for full frame is many magnitudes more expensive to produce) but you might want to try Minoltas 20 or 24/2.8, or the suprisingly awesome Sigma 24/2.8 for MD mount. – Tzarium Oct 20 '11 at 11:43
Thanks very much for your suggestions :) – Ross Anderson Oct 20 '11 at 12:21

If the adaptor is a good one no characteristics of the lens will change. The lens will be placed in exactly the correct spot it should be, and all will be functioning as normal.

Some mounts however don't have an easy conversion with optics correcting focal shift. If those optics aren't included, then the converter will act like an extension tube. This will move the focus of the lens, and usually mean you can no longer focus on infinity.

Having a quick google of MD to E mount adaptors it seems that they do allow you to focus to infinity without adaptors, so it should be business as usual with no adjustment to what you see.

Difference in sensor size between cameras may effect your FoV however

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.