Alley in Pisa, Italy

by Lars Kotthoff

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Entry level dSLR's, for the most part, are using less expensive SD and SDHC memory cards,

So, why do pro-sumer and professional cameras (for the most part) use only Compact Flash (CF) memory? Is it a performance, reliability or durability issue?

share|improve this question
    
At the risk of posting to an old, dead thread, I will say no matter what the technology, you get what you pay for. Especially as SDHC cards become common for SLRs and drive the price down even further, watch out for cheap cards. Buy from a reputable retailer, and don't always but the cheapest card. Especially, watch out for fakes. If the deal is too good to be true, it probably is! –  AngerClown Jan 21 '11 at 4:38
add comment

6 Answers 6

up vote 19 down vote accepted

Initially the reason was performance and capacity. A lot of the pro-level cameras went CF because you needed the performance and, usually because a pro shoots RAW, the capacity which the original SD couldn't match. Not to mention there was a point in time where SD was more expensive as a result of volume sales differences. SD is now cheaper thanks in a big way to the proliferation of small devices that used them such as point and shoot cameras, media players, etc.

Anyways, the speed/capacity issues largely evaporated with SDHC and will evaporate with SDXC. Then I think you will see a big move, in fact the shift is already happening without SDXC support in any camera. Canon's 1Ds as noted, but even Pentax stayed SDHC with the 645D medium format and that is miles away from a consumer camera. Also what we are starting to see is dual card support because SD cards are nice and small, that's a nice thing to have and impractical with CF.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Mostly because CF has faster read/write speed than SD card. SDHC has a higher capacity (more space) but not necessarily faster read/write speed.

Some high-end CFs allow parallel read/write (the interface allow this), but not SD/SDHC. So some high-end camera usually take advantage of this in combination with their buffer.

Now Rob Galbraith did lots of test ... and his conclusion is basically it does not really matter for most of us - unless you have that Nikon D3s and do a lot of rapid continuous shooting.

share|improve this answer
1  
SDHC has a higher capacity but originaly SD lagged behind CF by quite a lot. –  Martin Beckett Jul 28 '10 at 22:36
add comment

And since this thread has now been resurrected, I'd like to add another reason that I'm surprised nobody has mentioned.

  • Pro cameras tend to use Compact Flash because pro photographers prefer the size of Compact Flash cards. They're bigger, easier to handle with gloves on, harder to lose. They're also perceived as being tougher due to the size. Whether or not they are is irrelevant.

When you're shooting day in and day out to earn a living these things really matter!

share|improve this answer
add comment

I guess in part because CF cards are bigger, and so it's easier to develop faster and larger quantities of memory in large-sizes, before scaling down to the smaller SD cards later on. I think the added bulk and resilience of the more substantial CF cards.

I'd imagine most of the professional camera body users also have a fair amount already invested in CF cards, and so are likely to be reluctant to have to replace all of their CF cards with SDs.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Some professional DSLRs do support SDHC, such as Canon's 1Ds Mark III. Historically, Compact Flash offered higher capacity with miniature hard disks, although with advances in flash memory, solid state media has long overtaken it. Manufacturers don't want to give any excuse for photographers from upgrading, so tend to carry on supporting CF.

share|improve this answer
add comment

As SD cards are getting faster and more common, they should gradually displace CF cards in the professional market.

The fastest commonly-available SD cards on the market can reach speeds of up to 100 MB/s, so performance is much less of an issue than it once was. With the introduction of UHS-II (and with Toshiba already having developed a 260 MB/s card), it's only a matter of time before more pro-level cameras adopt SD cards.

Most laptop computers now have a media reader that accepts SD cards, but CF cards usually require separate equipment to read. The vast majority of consumer cameras accept SD cards, so it's a lot more convenient for enthusiasts to be able to keep using their existing memory cards when they move up to a more powerful camera.

The real reason CF is still on the market is historical: CF was once widely used for both professional and consumer cameras. When SD cards were first introduced (as MMC), they were significantly smaller than CF cards making them ideal for compact cameras, but had technical limitations which significantly limited their speed and maximum capacity. CF cards communicate using the PATA (or EIDE) interface once widely used by hard drives and are physically much larger than SD cards, making it easier to design for high performance and capacity. They were therefore retained for use in professional cameras where compactness is not as important as speed and capacity. Now that the original technical limitations of the SD card interface have been overcome, SD cards should gradually replace CF cards in pro-level equipment.

This transition to SD in high-end equipment is already in progress. Enthusiast-class cameras like the Nikon D600 and D7100, Canon EOS 6D and 70D, and Pentax K-3 all take SD cards and have UHS-I support. Given that cameras in this class have traditionally used CF cards, we can expect this transition to continue into the semi-pro and professional classes.

share|improve this answer
    
I think the move to SD is obvious, it is smaller. Smaller will win out once speed and capacity are on par. –  dpollitt Jan 5 at 19:23
    
There must still be a market for CF cards somewhere. facebook.com/TheDigitalPicture/posts/… –  Michael Clark Jan 8 at 3:42
    
@MichaelClark: That's a CFast card. CFast is intended as a successor to CF and uses the SATA interface used by modern hard drives instead of PATA. –  DragonLord Jan 8 at 17:35
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.