by ʇolɐǝz ǝɥʇ qoq

Submit your Photo
Hall of Fame

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

When speaking in terms of flash specifications, what is flash duration and how does it impact exposure?

share|improve this question
up vote 8 down vote accepted

Simply, it's the duration the flash is actually on, emitting light.

This doesn't impact exposure per se; as long as the same amount of light is emitted, you'll get the same exposure. But it can affect the result: as the flash duration gets shorter, it has a better ability to freeze motion.

For most photography this won't matter very much. 1/1000s is a typical duration for decent flashguns at full power1, which is more than sufficient to freeze normal motion in a photograph. Other aspects will have much more bearing on the results; flash power, shutter speed, and so forth.

The one example I can imagine where shorter flash durations would be particularly desirable is for high-speed photography.

  1. Studio strobes are sometimes rated faster, but thanks to their different characteristics, may be slower in practice. More detail here:
share|improve this answer

The duration is exactly that - the amount of time that the flash is lit for. The longer the flash is lit, then the more light can be used to illuminate the scene.

Flash power affects its "guide number" with more powerful flashes having a higher guide number and you can get the same amount of light out of a more powerful flash in a shorter time, which allows you to capture faster moving objects.

share|improve this answer

Duration is how long the bulb is on, essentially, and so determines how much light is applied to the subject. The duration would then have an impact on freezing a subject, shorter durations able to freeze faster motion. This is very common in high speed photography such as water drops and the like where you apply a very short burst of light to freeze the drop and/or splash at that brief moment.

I use this technique a lot with water drops, my actual shutter is open for a second and I will apply a very short burst of light to freeze the motion. So, clearly, the room needs to be very dark, but now the shutter is irrelevant to stopping the motion, it's all in the light.

share|improve this answer
It should be noted that there is a slight difference in freezing motion with flash vs. with shutter. Your example is excellent, however you might want to note that while the flash will freeze the water drops for the moment they are lit, you'll also get a sense of their motion for the rest of the duration the shutter is open (or the inverse if your using back-curtain flash sync.) – jrista Jul 29 '10 at 2:07

One thing I'd add to Matt's explanation would be that when you use high-speed flash sync (available on most same-brand DSLR+flash combinations) to get shorter shutter times below your camera sync speed (X-sync), the flash actually fires multiple times, so you can't use it to freeze fast moving subjects, because all you'd get would be several phases merged together.

share|improve this answer

Time taken by flash to reach its peak level is flash duration.

For easier understanding -

Let's say a flash was lit for 1 second.(From zero to peak and then back to zero).

Then flash duration = 1/2 second. (From zero to peak).

share|improve this answer
As your answer disagrees with the other 4 answers currently on this page, can you cite some reference that suggests your answer is correct? Also, you seem to be assuming that the change in flash intensity is symmetrical, and that isn't even close to true. – Caleb Feb 7 at 20:31

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.