Summer Start

by VonSchnauzer

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have no experience whatsoever with photography, but it's a subject that has interested me for quite some time. As a beginner, what should I be focusing on? What camera should I get? Any other general advice?

share|improve this question
11  
Should focus on the eyes. –  ysap Sep 24 '11 at 14:45
    
If you are the kind of person who benefits from book learnin', see the excellent recommendations here: photo.stackexchange.com/questions/4804/… –  mattdm Sep 24 '11 at 14:47
    
have a look on this question: photo.stackexchange.com/questions/15857/… –  Juhele Sep 24 '11 at 22:18

5 Answers 5

up vote 11 down vote accepted

You should focus on taking pictures!

Don't worry too much about the gear. If you're really interested in this as a hobby, I suggest budgeting a significant chunk right off (See this slightly-tongue-in-cheek article) and buying some decent mid-range gear.

I don't mean you need to buy a ton of stuff without knowing what you need, but if you jump in at higher than the entry-level, you'll have more flexibility, room to grow, and not be as distracted by lusting after better gear (you'll know that what you have is good enough even though there's always something better). Most crucially, you'll have a camera designed for direct access to the essential controls, rather than one designed to produce snapshots without any thought. (See Are there disadvantages to a prosumer camera for a beginner, aside from cost? for more on this.)

You almost certainly want a camera with interchangeable lenses, but it's not a necessity. You could go for a high-end point and shoot like the Canon G12, or something like the lovely Fujifilm X100, which has a large sensor and a built-in lens tailored to go with it. Interchangeable lenses offer a lot more flexibility, but unlimited flexibility isn't necessarily all good.

A dSLR with a prime lens or two is a good choice too, or one of the newer mirrorless options (like Micro 4/3rds) with one of the tiny "pancake" lenses. Some people will suggest a basic zoom lens; some will recommend the prime-lens route, as I am doing — this is basically a choice of personal style. (While prime lenses offer some image quality advantages and usually wider max apertures, this can also be seen as a place where less flexibility helps learning by providing structure.)

So anyway, get something, and start taking a lot of pictures. Malcolm Gladwell puts forth the idea that to be great at anything, you need to put in about 10,000 hours of working at it. So, the most important thing is to not obsess about how to start and to just do it.

Take a lot of pictures, and then review each one with a critical eye. What are your favorites? What worked, what didn't? Narrow down your favorites from each batch, and make prints from those — there's really no substitute for the physical artifact. Look at other photographs you like. What makes them work? How do yours compare?

By repeating this process of taking pictures and narrowing them down, you'll become good.

share|improve this answer
3  
I'll second the prime lenses. Whilst zoom lenses are obviously great for versatility, I think working with a prime helps you concentrate more on framing and subject matter without getting distracted so much by the 'choice' of focal lengths and things to snap. You can only really concentrate on certain things within a certain distance, rather than being able to zoom in on everything. I personally thinkk it helps you 'learn' better –  Dreamager Sep 24 '11 at 14:20
    
Hi, if DSLR, than I would recommend to buy a kit first - body with some lens like 18-55, start working with it, learning what you can do with it and what not and after finding the limitations you can buy some fixed focal length lenses. –  Juhele Sep 24 '11 at 22:15

You should acquire anything which shoots images and experiment. Lots. Digital is helpful in this regard but not essential.

share|improve this answer

About the camera:

If you are interested in "LEARNING" photography and at the same time you are a beginner, then in my opinion, you should get a real "CHEAP" digital camera with a fully "MANUAL" mode and a raw shooting format. Reason: With that cheap camera, you'll get a real life experience about the importance of matters like:

  1. ISO noise: In which cases does it occur? Does it really matter to you, is there a way to get around it through PP or you are not a PP person etc.
  2. Shallow depth of field: Do you like to blur out the background to extremes, or you don't mind creating artificial effects through GIMP.
  3. Sensor size: Large or small, how much large needed in which situation. How small sensor size should be avoided etc.
  4. Do mega pixels matter, if yes in what way.
  5. Do you really need a separate flash? ...

So, when purchasing a full fledged DSLR, you'll know WHAT exactly do YOU want in a camera, and you won't go on asking people which camera version should I purchase. These things can also be learnt by reading books, but IMO a theory won't teach you what a real life experience can.

share|improve this answer
2  
I agree with you, but cheap and good access to manual control don't often come in the same package. –  mattdm Sep 24 '11 at 14:18
    
@mattdm Cannon Powershot SX210 IS cost: $310 –  TheIndependentAquarius Sep 24 '11 at 15:07
    
— no RAW support in that, without a beta version of CHDK. And, while I haven't used that camera, it doesn't look particularly strong on manual control. It does offer those options, but not in a way that looks to be a pleasure to use. –  mattdm Sep 25 '11 at 1:38
    
@mattdm Yes, no raw support is the problem there, but it DOES contain all the manual mode functions which can be set individually, as well as in programmable mode. And I have not found any problems in using any of the functions in any way. I own that camera. –  TheIndependentAquarius Sep 25 '11 at 2:38
    
It doesn't look like a bad camera at all, but the manual controls seem to be a little out of the way. A camera targeted at the intermediate/enthusiast level will have direct, dedicated controls for aperture, shutter speed, and ISO. –  mattdm Sep 25 '11 at 2:53

I would definitely agree that you should focus on getting out there and taking pictures!

  • Focus on composition

  • Try shooting in Aperture Priority to see how changing the aperture affects the depth of field, and notice what your camera does to the shutter speed setting when you change the f stop.

share|improve this answer
    
I would say “composition and light”. –  Edgar Bonet Sep 25 '11 at 10:55

The problem with most photographs isn't the camera, but the photographer. That in mind, whatever camera you have is a really, really good place to start. I would focus on learning what your point-and-shoot, iPhone, or whatever can do, and pushing it to the limits. Learn about composition, because composition is most of what makes pictures interesting or boring. Then work on using the light available to you in a room or outside to try seeing how illuminating subjects or allowing shadows to fall on them creates different effects.

Once you've really pushed your camera to its limits and mastered everything it offers, then think of upgrading. In the meantime, you will probably only be spending money you needn't have spent.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.