Open

by damned truths

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A few years ago I got my first DSLR (a Canon EOS 350D), as well as my first tripod. Now I changed my camera to Nikon D90, but kept the tripod. When I first tried to mount my new camera on the old tripod, I got confused — there was no fixation hole on the camera's bottom as the tripod head would presume. Without that, there is nothing to make the camera stay at fixed position at all angles of z-axis (x being left-right, y being up-down, z being forward-backward). Here are the pictures to help you out:

tripod's head camera's bottom

Do I need to get a separate head for my tripod to accommodate my new D90? If not, how would camera stay in its position when the tripod is configured to take vertical or portrait photos?

share|improve this question
    
I am wondering the same thing, old film cameras had hole, that the tripod mounts pin goes in. So that camera wont tilt down slolwly, and you dont have to use a pliers to tigten the scre ( Like I do ) :( –  user14284 Dec 29 '12 at 0:32

2 Answers 2

up vote 5 down vote accepted

That pin normally engages into a hole in a quick-release clamp base (and I can't recall ever owning a camera that had a hole for a registration pin, though I've owned a lot of cameras). The clamping force of the screw, combined with the surface area of the contact between the camera and the tripod head, should be more than enough to secure the camera.

You should be able to obtain a quick-release set (clamp and plate) for relatively low cost if you want a QR, but don't get a cheap plastic set. Alternatively, you can probably drive or press the pin out of the head, leaving a flat plate. You would probably want to add some sort of cushion to prevent marring of the camera -- one of those thin rubber sheets they sell as a jar opener would do the trick.

share|improve this answer
    
I tried screwing in hard enough, but the weight of the lens still weighed down the camera. I guess I'll have to find a decent quick-release set. –  Eimantas Sep 19 '11 at 18:43
2  
Maybe you should use a tripod ring on the lens for better balance rather then mounting the camera body. What weight is the tripod rated for? Based on the pictures above you might be pushing the weight limits. –  Jakub Sep 20 '11 at 1:25

Can you press the pin in (does it sit on a spring)? If so, then this seems pretty normal to me. Like @Stan, I don't remember having a camera body with such a hole. I don't have it with me now, but IIRC there is non on the Rebel XT (350D) as well.

According to the picture, it seems like what you have there is a QR plate on your tripod. Just disengage it, use the screw to secure the plate to the camera (forget about that pin) and attach it back to the tripod.

share|improve this answer
1  
My canon 350D had the hole for that pin. And yes, that pin sits on a spring. –  Eimantas Sep 19 '11 at 18:44

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.