Westminster fountain at sunset

by Jorge Córdoba

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If you'd were to teach photography, how would you start, and why?

Would you first teach camera usage, then composition, then exposure?

Or would you start with composition without a camera, then camera usage?

Or just teach camera usage and exposure and leave composition to personal taste?

Please keep in mind, this question is explicitly not about learning photography, but about teaching it.

share|improve this question
    
Interesting question that I will follow closely, since my oldest daughter has started to show an interest. Should probably be a community wiki though. –  Fredrik Mörk Jul 28 '10 at 11:53
1  
Is this on the level of teaching a class, or how to get a friend to take better pictures (that is, your friend wants you to teach him to take better pictures.) If the second, I'd say get a digital camera and experiment (playing with it is just like experimentation, except with experimentation you take notes, mentally or otherwise.) Then you can help explain why some techniques/things work and others don't. –  Lasse V. Karlsen Jul 28 '10 at 12:04
    
@Fredrik, you are right, changed to wiki. @Lasse, it is about teaching. To tell someone to experiment is not really teaching others, its more like learning, won't you say? –  Sam Jul 28 '10 at 12:17
    
Yes, I know, but I've had friends asking me to teach them things, particularly in using computers, and I've often resorted to give them a fallback route and told them to experiment. But I agree, it's not teaching at all. –  Lasse V. Karlsen Jul 28 '10 at 12:29
    
@Lasse and @Sam - I disagree, telling them how the exposure triangle works is instruction, showing them how to experiment with it is teaching. When they experiment, then they will know. –  John Cavan Jul 28 '10 at 14:33

2 Answers 2

up vote 8 down vote accepted

First a bit of a background to my answer. In the days before digital cameras were widely available (or available at all), people asking "what camera should I get to learn photography", answers would tend to go along the lines "get your self an old, manual camera so that you learn from the ground up". I always found that rather stupid. If you stick a manual camera in the hands of a newbie, chances are that all images come out completely crappy, exposure way off and so on. I can't see a more efficient way of killing and aspiring interest in photography. My advice was always the opposite; get something fully automatic (but with manual capabilities), and focus on the image. The rest will come.

Different people will have to approach the subject in different ways. Photography has two sides; the technology and the image. I have seen plenty of stunning images captured by people of haven't got the slightest clue about aperture, or ISO settings or shutter speeds. All it took was an eye for a good image. I have seen fewer great images from technological virtuosos without an artistic eye. Of course, it helps if you can predict the result in some way by knowing the technology, but I would argue that it is not strictly necessary to know all about how aperture, shutter speed and ISO are chained together.

So, I would say, start off with the image. Dive into composition, what makes an image more or less interesting. These discussions will most likely spawn threads into the technological field (How do I get the background more out of focus in my portraits?" or "How do I get more of this landscape to be in focus?" - start talking about aperture and how it affects depth of field - "Wow, how can I do to capture the feeling of speed when that motorcycle drives by?" - start talking about shutter speeds). When there are specific cases to talk about, it is often easier to learn. When a beginner has captured an image that they feel proud of, but perhaps wonder how it could get even better, there is a hunger for learning that will make things so much easier.

share|improve this answer
1  
+1, great answer! compact digital camera has changed the playing field completely -- more people can learn photography at a lower cost and effort. –  nik Jul 29 '10 at 9:14
    
+1 Couldn't have said it better myself! I ran into the technological problem myself. My first photos were great, as they were simply off the cuff. I dove into the technical stuff far too early, though, and I've been digging myself out of that pit ever since. There probably isn't a technological detail I don't know something about now...but my images are lacking that raw artistic talent. Better to start with the art, and let the rest come. –  jrista Jul 31 '10 at 5:46

I generally agree with Fredrik, I think with the features of modern cameras a beginner can be overwhelmed and so it's best to let the camera do the work as they begin to understand what makes a good picture. It basically removes distractions and lets them focus, no pun intended, on what they see in the viewfinder or display.

Once they have confidence that they can compose a good picture, they can then start to play with the various options on the camera, especially if they're using an SLR. The single biggest upside to digital is that mistakes don't really cost, except for time that they already want to invest. Got a terrible shot? Delete it and try again. That gives so much freedom as you can experiment with the effects of shutter speed, aperture, and ISO on various subjects and just learn from doing it and without the expense of developing your mistakes.

So, in a sense, I'm suggesting that the best way to teach them is to have them do. Of course, that doesn't mean that you don't start them off with the basics of things like composition, exposure, and such, but that you then encourage them to just do it.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.