Shadowy Daisy

Shadowy Daisy
by damned-truths

Submit your Photo
Hall of Fame

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What I really want is an extension tube for my telephoto lens. (70-200mm Canon) I have an opportunity to purchase a number of macro tubes. Will those also work with the telephoto lens?

share|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

Yup, they'll work - tubes should work* with any lens, even a reversed one for extreme macro.

But the magnification is relative to the focal length - so adding 50mm of extension tubes to 200mm doesn't get you super close, show stopping macro shots. Using it at the 70mm end will produce higher magnification shots (although probably not 1:1), but less working distance.

Also, check out How can I estimate the reproduction ratio of an unknown macro setup? and How can I calculate the change an extension tube makes to the maximum magnfication of a lens?

*Obviously if they don't have electrical contacts you'll lose a lot of auto stuff, but that's not relevant to the focal length issue.

share|improve this answer
Great. Thanks. The guy is selling a whole bunch for real cheap so I will play around with them. – Jakub Sep 9 '11 at 15:24
@Jakub - You can get simple tubes wicked cheap on Amazon, so caveat emptor.… – rfusca Sep 9 '11 at 15:28
Though if you are reversing the lens a wide-angle is better. – ElendilTheTall Sep 9 '11 at 15:29
@Elendil - You could theoretically stack a wide angle on a super telephoto and put extension tubes on that for upwards of 20:1 + – rfusca Sep 9 '11 at 16:04

A few months ago, I used tubes with my Canon 135/2.8 to get a shot I couldn't get with anything else in my bag, including a 50/1.4 which is theoretically "better" to use with tubes.

The shortest tube I had on the 50 compressed DoF so much and reduced the far focus distance so much that I simply couldn't get the shot. The subject was too big to fit in the frame once it was in focus, and I would have had to close down the aperture too much for the available light. (Raising ISO wasn't an option here.)

All I really needed for this shot is to reduce the near focus limit a bit so I could get a little closer than the lens would allow on its own.

So, yes. Tubes FTW.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.