Incense

by Bart Arondson

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Have a look at these snaps. On the first one the church has the right exposure but the tree is too dark. On the other hand in the second one the tree is perfect but the church is too bright.

Is there any technique/parameter setting i should use to capture both things with the right exposure?

Right Exposure for the church

Right Exposure for the tree

Thanks!

share|improve this question

4 Answers 4

up vote 15 down vote accepted

It looks like the first one has the right exposure. Not only is the church properly exposed but the tree has not lost details except in the darkest shadows.

If you wish for the tree to be brighter then you will be able to adjust things using a post-processing software (look for levels, curves or something similar). Since a camera sensor has a fixed dynamic-range there is nothing much you can do about controlling all the tones in a single shot.

For the times where the dynamic-range of the scene is too high, people use Exposure-Fusion or HDR which requires multiple shots taken and merged by software to capture details across all tonal ranges.

share|improve this answer

Expose for the brightest things in the scene. You can often pull details out of the shadows, but once something goes pure white then there's nothing you can do. In this case the exposure settings for your first image are preferable.

Canon has a mode called Highlight Tone Priority which is designed for situations like this, which will underexpose the image to protect the highlights and then boost the shadows and midtones to obtain a less dark looking picture. I think Nikon's active d-lighting is similar.

Alternatively if you shoot raw you can get the same effect (but with more control) when you do your raw conversion (provided you haven't blown the highlights).

Finally you can combine exposures as Itai suggests using a technique called HDR. This requires extra preparation such as using a tripod, shooting multiple exposures (which creates difficulties if you have movement), and a lot more fiddling in post production to get good looking results.

In summary I would suggest shooting single raw images, exposing for the highlights and boosting the shadows during raw conversion.

share|improve this answer
1  
Once it goes pure black there's nothing you can do either. It's just that pure white is usually more attention grabbing than pure black is. –  Billy ONeal Aug 5 '11 at 23:01

The darker trees in the first picture are not so dark that the details are lost. They are just a little bit dark. You should use any sort of image editing software. There are a lot to chose from. Lightroom, Aperture och Photoshop Elements are all good commercial programs. You could also give Gimp a spin.

In whatever program You choose there should be a slider to lighten the shadows. That should do it for this picture.

Good luck!

share|improve this answer

As Itai mentioned.. the first one seems to be the right exposure. However the dynamic range is not high enough to warrant HDR. Try playing with levels/curves selectively to get the tree to your liking..

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.