Alley in Pisa, Italy

by Lars Kotthoff

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is it better to invest in one 18-135mm lens or have a standard 18-55mm lens and another 55-250mm lens for occasional need?

share|improve this question
    
You may also find some useful answers at What is a good two lens “starter kit”?, and, actually, Getting ready to buy an entry-level dSLR — should I skip the kit lens?, which asks about the 18-135mm vs the 18-55mm. –  mattdm Jul 13 '11 at 11:44
    
18-135 then after next purcahse a 90-300mm your all set. –  ppumkin Jul 14 '11 at 19:23

3 Answers 3

Things to consider 18-135mm:

  • You dont need 135-250mm range.
  • You dont like to change lens frequently.
  • You want slightly better image quality within consumer grade.
  • You want to carry only one lens with you.

Things to consider 18-55mm and 55-250mm:

  • You dont mind changing lens often.
  • You want the 135-250mm focal range.
  • You dont mind the slightly less contrast produced by the 55-250mm.
  • You dont mind carrying around multiple lenses with you.

Personally I think, if you want an all in one solution, you should get the 18-200mm, or if you prefer image quality, get the 15-85mm.

share|improve this answer
    
thanks a lot , really helpful –  parag Jul 13 '11 at 11:34

There's quite a bit of difference in the focal length range covered by a 18-135mm vs a total range of 18-250mm between two lenses.

Its really a bit of apples and oranges comparison.

If you need the longer focal length, go for the longer setup. If you just need 18-135 range, get that one. Quality wise, they're all consumer zoom lenses and probably about the same.

share|improve this answer

With my previous (Pentax) camera I have had the 2 kit lens combo (18-55, 55-200) With my latest (Canon) I have the 18-135 and I am not thrilled with this lens. I've done some prior research and was expecting more in terms of image quality. I also didn't think I would miss the extra reach but I do. Thank god I also purchased the prime Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM otherwise my Canon experience would have been a sour one. I find the 18-135 so mediocre in terms of image quility, bokeh, etc. (I feels pretty good though) I only use it when I really have to, the prime lens is also the primary lens the moment.

What I should have done was just to get the body (or buy a cheaper older body) and get a pair of decent lenses instead of the one kit. @ShuttterBug has already suggested the 15-85mm which suppose to be very good for its class. Personally I would go with the Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM, Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM and 50mm f/1.4 USM combo.
However to answer your question; given only those 2 choices I would personally go with the 2 lenses rather then the 18-135.

share|improve this answer
    
Fantastic and direct advice. Thanks a lot. –  parag Jul 14 '11 at 4:54

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.