I am an eye surgeon and take photoes for patients with squint (crossed eyes) showing the eyes only. I also need to take photoes to lid lesions which may be 3-10mm only. I already have the 18-105 lens. What is best macro lens for me and my Nikon D90 camera?
|
Well a few considerations...
There's two lenses that generally meet this criteria, depending on your budget.
The Sigma is the budget friendly option, but the Nikon is definitely the sharper and better lens. The Nikon brings faster, quieter autofocus and a stabilization (VR) to help you handhold in lower light. (The Tamron 90mm Macro is another popular telephoto macro lens, but its price about equivalent to the Sigma and the Sigma has slightly more reach). |
|||||||
|
|
An alternative would be to buy extension tubes for your lenses. You can get great results without having to buy dedicated macro lenses. |
|||
|
|
|
I own the Nikon 105mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor Lens and use it on a D7000. It is a great macro lens, all-though a little pricy, with a long Nikon history. It is really sharp and will provide a good working distance for your squint shoots. To capture the lesions in detail you will have to get really close (e.g. 1:1 reproduction). I think this lens will serve you pretty well. However, the VR (Vibration Reduction, Image Stabilization) is a nice ad-on if you need to shoot handheld or use the lens as a short telephoto (maybe squint shoots), but it will not replace a sturdy tripod for serious macro photography, which a 3-10mm subject (lesions) is IMHO. Since I have the eyes of a sparrow hawk ;-) and never was at an eye surgeon/specialist, I therefore do not really know how you work and how you might use the lens. But you might also want to think about using sturdy tripod with a proper tripod head and fixing the patients head or provide a comfortable backup so the patients head will not shake. I guess as an eye-surgeon you should already be aware of the latter. |
||||
|
|
Try this: This lens allows a reasonable working distance (about 5.5 inches) and is reasonably priced at about $500. However, it cannot be fully utilized on FX-format (full-frame) camera bodies. |
|||
|
|