by ʇolɐǝz ǝɥʇ qoq

Submit your Photo
Hall of Fame

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a Canon 1000d. Is the zone focusing technique applicable in a DSLR?

If yes, how do we do it?

share|improve this question

If you have focus range markings for aperture settings, yes.

If you already know the possible ranges for a lens that doesn't have markings, you can use a DOF preview to see where your focal range is. IF that option isn't available to you, then you'll have to do practice shots until you understand the position on the focus ring for your best setting. If your lens does not have focus marks, then you'll really have to eyeball it!

Zone focus is a function of optics and the markings just make it easier on humans to do it faster.

The wikipedia page goes into great detail about how to read these markings:

Edit: From the wiki article, here is the image that is used to show these marks: Zone Focus Markings

On this lens the aperture is set to F11 (see the little dot above the 11 at the bottom of the image). Just above that is a large white mark with 11's, 16's, and 22's on either side. These indicate the zone of focus for each f stop.
If you place your subject within these zones and set your focus dial somewhere in this range for the f-stop you're using, it will be in focus. For this image, the distance scale shows that from about 2 meters to 1 meter will be in focus.

If your lens does not have the aperture scale with the focus marks, then you'll need to make these estimates with your eyes, noting what points are in the zone. You'll need to use your camera's depth of field preview function if available. If not, then you'll have to take a test picture and view that way.

share|improve this answer
Any chance you could quote the relevant portion of that wiki article here, for easier reading? – jrista Jun 22 '11 at 5:33

There is an easier way to accomplish this if you don't want to look at the lens markings. Near:far distances from the same Wikipedia article cited above) are far more reliable when you are not measuring the distance to your subject. Here's how it works: There is a point we can call "optimal focus". Judged with the aperture wide open, it's pretty easy tell where that is.

Once the camera stops the lens down for exposure, there will be an area in front of and behind that point that will also be in focus. Although not strictly true for distances short of hyperfocal (again, the same article), a rule of thumb is that objects 1/3 in front and 2/3 behind are likely to be in focus. That means focus a little further away than the first object you want in focus, but not too far back because you are only likely to get 1/3 of the way.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.