by ʇolɐǝz ǝɥʇ qoq

Submit your Photo
Hall of Fame

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

For large ensemble TV show casts, the typical promo photo tend to be a wide shot with everyone standing, with minimal body overlap. It seems like you would need a wide angle to get the whole scene if they are shooting in a studio, but the verticals are perfect at the edges.

How would you replicate this? And is it possible these are photoshopped together from separate portraits?

Examples (you can find many more by image searching for "cast photo"):

share|improve this question
Those are just multiple images/catpures photoshopped together.. – Berzemus Jun 14 '11 at 13:42
up vote 14 down vote accepted

These are Photoshopped. Each actor is photographed separately or in small groups as appropriate. Then each actor is cut out of their original image and placed in an empty background (either photographed or computer generated).

You can see in some cases that the angle at which the subjects' feet meet the ground isn't quite right (take a look at Christina Hendricks' feet, the red-head in the Mad Men shot, and Kiefer Sutherland's feet in the 24 shot), and that there is no interaction between any of the subjects (apart from where they've been photographed together, as in the guy sat down on the right of the Mad Men shot, where you can see the woman's skirt being pushed in by the chair).

Overall it's pretty simple stuff. The trickiest bit is making sure the lighting of the subjects is consistent (both between subjects and with the background: the 24 shot is a bit dodgy in this regard, it looks like the Kiefer Sutherland shot is from a completely different shoot); the Photoshopping is elementary stuff.

share|improve this answer
The 24 shot difference is likely intentional, in order to make him "pop" from the photo a bit. Could have been executed better, but rather than an error it was probably a conscious design choice. – Adam Davis Jun 14 '11 at 20:47
Taking a look at the shots before and after reading your answer is wild. The second time around, the photos went from "nice looking" to "unbelievably fake and poorly 'shopped." – Matt Ball Jun 14 '11 at 20:55
This alternate promo image for Mad Men just showing the main characters is even more proof it is a Photoshop. Some of the portraits are the same as the bigger version and others are alternate takes:… – smackfu Jun 14 '11 at 21:33
@Matt Ball - I've just expanded your mind. You're welcome. ;) – ElendilTheTall Jun 14 '11 at 21:44

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.