India Point Park

India Point Park
by matt-ball                

Submit your Photo
Hall of Fame

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'd like to create one of those "stacked" action shot images where multiple exposures are combined to show the subject moving across a static background. Here's an example I found on Flickr (by Laurence Asuncion):

Ideally, I'd like tips both for the photography part of this and for post-processing. For example, I'd imagine I want to shoot manual w/ the same exposure for all shots (as with a panorama), but I'm not sure if there are any other helpful tips for taking the shots. At one point, for example, I thought I'd have to tripod-mount the camera and keep the same framing for all shots, but I've now seen several examples where the composition moved from shot-to-shot.

I'm also interested in recommendations for post-processing -- software, technique, etc. I can envision a manual process where I stack layers and align them by hand in Photoshop Express, but I'd be surprised if there wasn't a better way — maybe using a pano tool like Hugin.

share|improve this question
Added a bounty as Matt's answer is great, but would be interested if there are any other approaches to this. – Maynard Case May 23 '11 at 16:35
I heard that this technique is coming with some DSLR camera who can combine multiple photos automatically without using any external software. I seen the snaps too. But I din't find which camera. example photo:… – Amit Gupta Dec 18 '12 at 16:04
I believe you're right -- in fact, I've seen a TV ad for a cameraphone, I think, where a guy is picking faces from multiple exposures to do a group portrait. This would have to use a similar content-merging technique. – D. Lambert Dec 18 '12 at 17:00
Cameras with multi exposure mode can do this automatically. google it, or visit… – Amit Gupta Dec 20 '12 at 1:56
Is there any app like this for an android phone? Like the drama function of the new sgs4? – user19224 Apr 7 '13 at 20:04
up vote 42 down vote accepted

Everything that applies to shooting a panorama applies to shooting one of these. A tripod makes assembling more convenient but means you can't pan to follow the action. It's important to rotate the camera and not move your feet in order to make sure the shots line up. Locking the focus is going to be necessary. Same with shutter/aperture.

I've only done one of these, it could have been shot on a tripod but the location didn't allow it! I loaded the images in Photoshop, auto-aligned and then manually masked the overlap areas, this was quite easy as the frames are just the right distance apart to minimise overlap. A bit of overlap adds to the effect, too much can make it hard to see what going on.

Here are the original shots:

Photoshop's built in panorama tool has no trouble aligning the images:

A drop shadow has been added to show where the edges are. As you can see there was a little panning. I did not shoot the images but I did the post production (and modelling :) the actual photos were taken by a friend of mine. Here are the images blended together:

Here are the masks used:

I did a bit more blending, rotated the image, and filled in some missing sky/foreground and adjusted the contrast slightly, here is the final image:

The camera settings were 1/800s f/8.0 ISO200 22mm

I would be possible to automate the process of overlapping the subject by subtracting the common background areas and layering up the frames in chronological order.

share|improve this answer
Good stuff. Mind if I ask why you want to lock the focus? I assume that implies a fairly large DOF, too, right? Do you happen to know the aperture for these photos? – D. Lambert May 20 '11 at 14:50
Locking the focus is important if you shoot with the camera stationary as otherwise the AF system could lock onto the background once your subject moves past the active AF point(s). If you pan the camera to track the subject it's less of a problem. I'll dig out the camera settings when I get home (and post a bigger image). – Matt Grum May 20 '11 at 15:17
Thanks. I've seen the focus problem when panning - that makes sense. The DOF is also something that I'm starting to recognize as I see more of these shots -- that's one of those things I hadn't thought about previously. – D. Lambert May 20 '11 at 16:34
The camera settings were 1/800s f/8.0 ISO200 22mm – Matt Grum May 23 '11 at 19:30
Thanks for the additions - the PP stuff is awesome! – D. Lambert May 23 '11 at 20:19

You're right — Hugin works very well for this. This is from a series of pictures I took with a P&S Fujifilm camera at the Children's Museum. It's not an action shot except in the sense that all pictures of children are action shots, but the process is pretty much the same.

Photo by me. Licensed CC BY-SA 3.0 in this size.

The images were all hand-held (braced against my knee), so there's pretty inevitable twists and turns between shots. Actually, since it wasn't really fast action, there's more difference than there might be in a burst. Hugin straightened that out, and adjusted the slight differences in exposure. The UI is really designed for people who know what they're doing, but I made it work anyway — selecting a projection and guessing at things until it came out right (which, despite the complication, just took a little experimentation). As a bonus, the considerable barrel distortion from the point-and-shoot zoom lens is turned into mostly-straight lines.

I took the resulting stack of images into Gimp as layers and erased through where my daughter is in each chair. Even though there's quite a bit of texture in the background, Hugin worked well enough that I didn't really have to worry about the overlap at all — it was all just smooth.

share|improve this answer
Thanks - it looks like you repositioned the chair between shots, right? – D. Lambert May 24 '11 at 2:25
There was a row of chairs all built to different scale — that's what gave me the idea. – mattdm May 24 '11 at 3:07
Oh, shoot -- yeah, I missed the chair size (oops). Makes sense now. Thanks. – D. Lambert May 24 '11 at 3:21
Relatively new versions of hugin can do the layering and masking automagically: – Habi Jan 23 '13 at 7:57

You have two excellent answers already, but as @Maynard has enquired about alternative techniques, there is another option if you have a flashgun with a stroboscopic mode:

This basically works by firing the flash multiple times during a single exposure to illuminate the subject as it moves across the frame. The downside is that you would need darkness or very low levels of ambient light to do this. However, it is much simpler as it can be done in-camera without any post-processing.

share|improve this answer
+1 for providing a way of getting the same effect in camera. It might be useful to add that an ND filter can help lower the light enough for a long exposure. – fmark May 24 '11 at 13:36
As old as camera days, but effective in a darker scene! – ysap Jul 17 '11 at 16:13

There's also an alternative application to Hugin: Autopano Pro by Kolor ( might be useful, but actually I am not sure how it would deal with the "differences", a.k.a. the motives you are actually looking for.

share|improve this answer

One of the method is actually to use panorama tool like PTGui for this purpose - it can help you avoid photoshopping trouble creating masks.

So for example you have a similar 5-7 action shot.

You load it in panorama tool PTGui - make alignment...

Then instead of actually doing panorama image - you just align source images; then you create not the panorama blend but rather a separate images - like layers in photoshop, They all would be aligned... If needed with adjusted image angles corrections etc.

Now all you have to do is load them in photoshop, in separate layers and erase overvlapping parts, keeping the subject (like skier) visible thorugh all resulted images...

Then you just blend them together....

Something like this

share|improve this answer
Yeah, that's what Matt Grum and I both did in our existing answers. :) – mattdm Jun 3 '12 at 1:46
It is best if you don't reiterate answers that have already been given, especially a year after the original question was asked. If you find there is a good answer, vote it up rather than reiterating it. Additionally, if you wish to visually demonstrate an effect, its best to actually include the visuals. – jrista Jul 14 '12 at 15:54

protected by jrista Jul 2 '13 at 16:08

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.